Abstract
Simple auditory RT was measured at three stimulus intensities under both speed and accuracy instructions. The slope of RT over intensity was greater for accuracy criteria, as predicted by statistical decision theory. Speed criterion performance was not attributable to a shift in preprogrammed anticipatory responses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
CHOCOLLE, R. Variations des temps de reaction auditif en fonction de l’intensité à divers frequences. Année Psychologique, 1945, 4142, 65–124.
GRICE, G. R. Stimulus intensity and response evocation. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 359–373.
JOHN, I. D. A statistical decision theory of simple reaction time. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1967, 19, 27–34.
McGILL, W. J. Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (Eds.) Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley, 1963. Pp. 309–360.
SMITH, E. E. Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 77–110.
SNODGRASS, J. G. Foreperiod effects in simple reaction time: Anticipation or expectancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 79, 1–19.
SNODGRASS, J. G., LUCE, R. D., & GALANTER, E. Some experiments on simple and choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 75, 1–17.
SWENSSON, R. G., & EDWARDS, W. Response strategies in a two-choice reaction task with a linear cost for time. Unpublished manuscript, 1970.
THRANE, V. C. Sensory and preparatory factors in response latency. V. Stimulus blanks as regulator of preparatory set. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1962, 3, 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henderson, L. Simple reaction time, statistical decision theory, and the speed-slowness tradeoff. Psychon Sci 21, 323–324 (1970). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03335803
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03335803