Skip to main content

Cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma as a function of interpersonal distance

Abstract

The prisoner’s dilemma game was played by Ss seated either physically close together or separated by a substantial physical distance. With greater distance, there were significantly fewer mutually cooperative choices, smaller earnings, and greater differences in outcome between the two players. Mutual cooperation among Ss in the far condition remained relatively infrequent throughout the trial sequence and extinguished completely in later trials.

References

  • ALBERT, S., & DABBS, J. M., JR. Physical distance and persuasion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1970, 15, 265–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEUTSCH, M. Trust, trustworthiness, and the F scale. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 1960, 61, 138–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HALL, E. T. The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • KELLY, H. H., & STAHELSKI, A. J. Social interaction basis of cooperators’ and competitors’ beliefs about others. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1970, 16, 66–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARLOWE, D., GERGEN, K. J., & DOOB, A. N. Opponent’s personality, expectation of social interaction, and interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 206–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEHRABIAN, A. Inference of attitude from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 1968a, 32, 296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEHRABIAN, A. Relationship of attitude to seated posture, orientation, and distance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1968b, 10, 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEWCOMB, T. M. Autistic hostility and social reality. Human Relations, 1947, 1, 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OSKAMP, S. Comparison of strategy effects in the prisoner’s dilemma and other mixed motive games. Proceedings: 78th Annual Convention, American Psychological Association, 1970, 433–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • PATTERSON, M. L., & SECHREST, L. B. Interpersonal distance and impression formation. Journal of Personality, 1970, 38, 161–166.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAPOPORT, A., & CHAMMAH, A. M. Prisoner’s dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOMMER, R. Personal space: The behavior-basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • TERHUNE, K. W. Motives, situation, and interpersonal conflict within prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 1968, 8(3, Pt. 2).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sensenig, J., Reed, T.E. & Miller, J.S. Cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma as a function of interpersonal distance. Psychon Sci 26, 105–106 (1972). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03335449

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03335449

Keywords

  • Impression Formation
  • Mutual Cooperation
  • Interpersonal Distance
  • Cooperative Play
  • Cooperative Response