Abstract
Research on the learning of prose material based on scripts has attempted to relate the remembering of script events to how typical the events are of the generic scripts. The novel object effect reported by Bellezza and Bower (1982) shows that a typical script event containing an unexpected object is rated less typical but is recalled better than an event irrelevant to the script. The novel-object effect implies that the relation between script-typicality ratings and remembering may not be a simple one. One explanation of the novel-object effect is that script sentences containing a novel object are processed longer during learning. The second explanation, the inference-contradiction explanation, suggests that the presented word representing a novel object both contradicts and yet becomes associated to information strongly inferred from the script. The results of the experiment reported here support the in ferencecontradiction explanation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bellezza, F. S. Mnemonic devices: Classification, characteristics, and criteria. Review of Educational Research, 1981, 51, 247–275.
Bellezza, F. S., & Bower, G. H. The representational and processing characteristics of scripts. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1981, 18, 1–4.
Bellezza, F. S., & Bower, G. H. Remembering script-based text. Poetics, 1982, 11, 1–23.
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 1979, 11, 177–220.
Graesser, A. C. Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
Graesser, A. C., & Nakamura, G. V. The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol.16). New York: Academic Press, 1982.
Hastie, R. Memory for behavioral information that confirms or contradicts a personality impression. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1980.
Rumelhart, D. E. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbaum, 1980.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Srull, T. Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human memory and learning. 1981, 7, 440–463.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant to the author from the Field-Wiltsie Foundation. The author would like to thank Kellie Vaughn and Melanie White for their help in collecting and scoring the data. Thanks also goes to Ohio University Computing and Learning Services for making computer time and their facilities available.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bellezza, F.S. Recalling script-based text: The role of selective processing and schematic cues. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 21, 267–270 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334706
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334706