Abstract
An expectancy account of figure-ground shifts, promoted as an alternative to satiation theory, was tested. One-hundred and three subjects in six conditions (Experiment 1) were either informed or uninformed about 12 to 13 ambiguous figures, and had either unlimited time or 30 sec in which to respond. In two of the conditions, head and eye movements were restricted, and in one condition, incidental learning was used. In keeping with an expectancy view, uninformed subjects saw fewer meaningful shapes than informed subjects did, and restricted eye/head movements played no role. However, in accord with a satiation view, most figures did shift for many subjects. Unexpected for both accounts, inspection time was not a factor. In Experiment 2, 59 uninformed subjects saw two ambiguous figures whose alternative shapes were physically emphasized in order to increase both attention and satiation. Contrary to satiation expectations, but supporting an expectancy position, subjects saw one shape as often as two. The applicability of inherent stimulus factors to figure-ground perception was discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coren, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Girgus, J. J., Rock, I., & Egatz, R. (1977). The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 550–556.
Kohler, W., & Wallach, H. (1944). Figure after-effect: An investigation of visual processes. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 88, 269–357.
Lindauer, M.S. (1969). Set and different degrees of ambiguity of the “wife and mother-in-law” figures. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 29, 911–913.
Lindauer, M. S., & Baust, R. F. (1974). Comparisons between 25 reversible and ambiguous figures on measures of latency, duration, and fluctuation. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 6, 1–9.
Lindauer, M. S., & Lindauer, J. F. (1970). Brightness differences and the perception of figure-ground. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 291–295.
Rock, I. (1984). Perception. New York: Scientific American.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A briefer version of this paper was read at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Arlington, VA, April 1987. The author wishes to thank Donna Merlo for conducting Conditions 4 and 5 of Experiment 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindauer, M.S. Expectation and satiation accounts of ambiguous figure-ground perception. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 27, 227–230 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334591
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334591