Abstract
Age-related decrements in motor plan restructuring were investigated. In this experiment older and younger adults performed a discrete aiming task that involved responses that were precued and responses that were modified at the time of an imperative signal. On 75% of the trials, the precue specified the response stimulus (valid trials) with respect to the movement parameters of arm (left or right) and direction (toward or away). On the remaining 25% of the trials, the response stimulus was different from the precue (invalid trials) in that the subject was required to modify a planned movement by changing the arm to be used and/or the direction of movement. The older subjects were slower than the younger in both the valid and invalid trials. Across preparatory intervals (PI) of 500, 1,000, 1,500, and 2,000 msec, older, but not younger subjects exhibited less reaction time cost for restructuring the motor plan for the direction-change condition than for the other parameter change conditions. Since there was little apparent cost of restructuring, these findings suggest that older adults did not prepare the direction of movement, and thus found it temporally more efficient to alter direction than arm or arm and direction combined.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amrhein, P. C., Stelmach, G. E., & Goggin, N. L. (1989). Age differences in the maintenance and restructuring of motor preparation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Botwinick, J., Brinley, J. F., & Robbin, J. S. (1959). Maintaining set in relation to motivation and age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 585–588.
Gottsdanker, R. (1980a). Aging and the maintaining of preparation. Experimental Aging Research, 6, 13–27.
Gottsdanker, R. (1980b). Aging and the use of advance probability information. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 133–143.
Gottsdanker, R. (1982). Age and simple reaction time. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 342–348.
Gottsdanker, R. (1984). Effort of preparation and age. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 59, 527–538.
Larish, D. D., & Stelmach, G. E. (1982). Preprogramming, programming, and reprogramming of aimed hand movements as a function of age. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 322–340.
Plamondon, R., Stelmach, G. E., & Teasdale, N. (1989). Motor program coding representation: The use of advance information in the production of line responses. Manuscript in preparation.
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1984). How old people prepare themselves for events which they expect. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.) Attention and performance X (pp. 515-527). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rabbitt, P. M. A., & Vyas, S. M. (1980). Actively controlling anticipation of irregular events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 435–446.
Rosenbaum, D. A., & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223–243.
Salthouse, T. A. (1985). Speed of behavior and its implications for cognition. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 400-426).New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Publishers.
Stelmach, G. E., Goggin N. L., & Amrhein, P. C. (1988). Aging and restructuring of precued movements. Psychology & Aging, 3, 151–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant AG05154 from the U.S. Public Health Service.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goggin, N.L., Stelmach, G.E. & Amrhein, P.C. Effects of age on motor preparation and restructuring. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 27, 199–202 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334583
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334583