Abstract
The processing of digit and unidimensional brightness stimuli was examined in the traditional Sternberg fixed-set paradigm. From a total set size of 10, 18 different memory sets were studied, 6 each at memory set sizes of 1, 2, and 3. Three different variables, which are in general correlated, were used to predict performance: memory set size (M), a measure based on inferred distance relationships among the stimuli constituting the positive and negative sets (d), and a measure based on the number of inferred “decision boundaries” necessary to separate all memory set items from the items remaining in the set (DB). For the digit stimuli the results were consistent with previous research, and memory set size was the prepotent predictor. For the unidimensional brightnesses, DB was the prepotent predictor, and choice reaction times (CRTs) to both positive and negative probes were a function of the distance of the probe item from the closest member of the complementary set. However, for the digit stimuli this was found only for negative probes; CRTs to positive digit probes were independent of the distance from the closest negative set member.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, R. C, & Juola, J. F. Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology. San Francisco: Freeman, 1974.
DeRosa, D., & Beckwith, M. Retrieval of information from organized memory sets. Psychonomic Science, 1971, 23, 177–179.
DeRosa, D., & Morin, R. Recognition reaction time for digits in consecutive and nonconsecutive memorized sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 83, 472–479.
Lockhead, G. Identification and the form of multidimensional discrimination space. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 85, 1–10.
Lockhead, G., & King, M. Classifying integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor mance, 1977, 3, 436–443.
Marcel, A. Some constraints on sequential and parallel processing and the limits of attention. Acta Psychologica, 1970, 33, 77–92.
Marcel, A. J. Negative set effects in character classification: A response retrieval view of reaction time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 29, 31–48.
Monahan, J., & Lockhead, G. Identification of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977, 106, 94–110
Monsell, S. Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time. Cognitive Psychology, 1978, 10, 465–501.
Nickerson, R. Binary-classification reaction time: A review of some studies of human information processing capabilities. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1972, 4, 274–318.
Sternberg, S. Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975, 27, 1–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported, in part, by an Indiana State University Research Foundation grant to the first author. Michael Kubovy and Gregory Lockhead’s comments, John Baldasare’s assistance with the analysis, and, especially, Jayne VanBramer’s assistance in the replication of one of the conditions are gratefully appreciated.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levy, R.M., Goldberg, D.M. & Schmid, J.C. Different predictors of memory scanning with unidimensional and digit stimuli. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 15, 331–334 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334549
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334549