Abstract
The present study was designed to extend the findings of Nelson (1978) in determining the relative sensitivities of recognition and savings for detecting small amounts of information in memory. Subjects learned a list of 20 number-noun paired associates to a recognition criterion. After a retention interval of 2, 3, or 4 weeks, subjects returned for tests of recall and recognition. Then, at relearning, some of the nonretrieved items remained the same as at original learning, and some new items were created by a re-pairing of numbers and nouns. After one relearning study trial, retention tests were again given. Statistical tests showed significant savings effects on all dependent measures. It was concluded that savings is a more sensitive retrieval measure than recognition and that subthreshold memory traces can exist and can be incremented by the process of concatenation. It was suggested that a reinstitution of old mediators may also play a role in the savings effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bahrick, M. P. Relearning and the measurement of retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967, 6, 89–94.
Battig, W. F., & Spera, A. Rated association values of numbers from 0-100. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1962, 1, 200–202.
Carey, S. T., & Lockhart, R. S. Encoding differences in recognition and recall. Memory & Cognition, 1973, 1, 297–300.
Crowder, R. G. Principles of learning and memory. New York: Wiley, 1976.
Ebbinghaus, H. [Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology] (H. A. Ruger & E. R. Bussenius, trans.). New York: Dover, 1964. (Originally published, 1885.)
Hall, J. W., Grossman, L. R., & Elwood, K. D. Differences in encoding for free recall vs. recognition. Memory & Cognition, 1976, 4, 507–513.
Jacoby, L. L. Test appropriate strategies in retention of categorized lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 675–683.
Luh, C. W. The conditions of retention. Psychological Monographs, 1922, 31(3, Whole No. 142).
McNemar, Q. Psychological statistics (4th ed.). New York: Wiley, 1969.
Nelson, T. O. Savings and forgetting from long-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971, 10, 568-576.
Nelson, T. O. Detecting small amounts of information in memory: Savings for nonrecognized items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978, 4, 453–468.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1968, 76(1, Pt. 2).
Postman, L., & Rau, L. Retention as a function of the method of measurement. University of California Publications in Psychology, 1957, 8, 217–270.
Smith, S. M. Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979, 5, 460–471.
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. M., & Bjork, R. A. Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 1978, 6, 342–353.
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Bureau of Publications, 1944.
Tversky, B. Encoding processes in recognition and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 5, 275–287.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was part of a master’s thesis submitted by the first author to the University of Maryland Baltimore County. The project was aided considerably by the advice and support of the committee members: Herbert Weingartner, Mark Moody, and Marilyn Wang. Computer time was provided by the Computer Science Center of the University of Maryland.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groninger, L.K., Groninger, L.D. A comparison of recognition and savings as retrieval measures: A reexamination. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 15, 263–266 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334527
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334527