Abstract
The ability of deaf college students to take advantage of derivational morphology is examined in an experiment on vocabulary acquisition. Using a paired-associate task, the deaf subjects were found to learn pseudoword-word pairs faster when semantically related words (e.g., book and read) were paired with derivationally related pseudowords (e.g., RALP and RALPIFY) than when they were paired with unrelated pseudowords (e.g., NARK and STRITIFY). These results converge with evidence obtained in other studies in indicating that deaf students are able to take advantage of English morphology when reading.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Conrad, R. (1979). The deaf schoolchild. London: Harper & Row.
Freyd, P., & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 282–295.
Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (2nd ed.) (1978). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hanson, V. L. (1991). Phonological processing without sound. In S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 153–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hanson, V. L., & Feldman, L. B. (1989). Language specificity in lexical organization: Evidence from deaf signers’ lexical organization of American Sign Language and English. Memory & Cognition, 17, 292–301.
Hanson, V. L., & Feldman, L. B. (1991). What makes signs related? Sign Language Studies, 70, 35–46.
Hanson, V. L., Shankweiler, D., & Fischer, F. W. (1983). Determinants of spelling ability in deaf and hearing adults: Access to linguistic structure. Cognition, 14, 323–344.
Hanson, V. L., & Wilkenfeld, D. (1985). Morphophonology and lexical organization in deaf readers. Language & Speech, 28, 269–280.
Jenkins, J. R., & Dixon, R. (1983). Vocabulary learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 237–260.
Karchmer, M. A., Milone, M. N., Jr., & Wolk, S. (1979). Educational significance of hearing loss at three levels of severity. American Annals of the Deaf, 124, 97–109.
LaSasso, C., & Davey, B. (1987). The relationship between lexical knowledge and reading comprehension for prelingually, profoundly hearing-impaired students. Volta Review, 89, 211–220.
Lichtenstein, E. H. (1985). Deaf working memory processes and English language skills. In D. S. Martin (Ed.), Cognition, education, and deafness: Directions for research and instruction (pp. 111–114). Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.
Nagy, W., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.
Nagy, W., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237–270.
Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Quigley, S., & King, C. (1980). Syntactic performance of hearing impaired and normal hearing individuals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 329–356.
Silverman-Dresner, T., & Guilfoyle, G. R. (1972). Vocabulary norms for deaf children. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
Taeschner, T., Devescovi, A., & Volterra, V. (1988). Affixes and function words in the written language of deaf children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 385–401.
Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 649–667.
Volterra, V., & Bates, E. (1989). Selective impairment of Italian grammatical morphology in the congenitally deaf: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 273–308.
White, T. G., Power, M. A., & White, S. (1989). Morphological analysis: Implications for teaching and understanding vocabulary growth. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 283–304.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant NS-18010 from the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke to the author when she was at Haskins Laboratories. I thank Deborah Kuglitsch for her help with testing subjects and Carol Padden for her help with stimulus preparation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanson, V.L. Productive use of derivational morphology by deaf college students. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 31, 63–65 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334142
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334142