Abstract
Previous research has consistently shown that bizarre sentences are recalled better than common ones in mixed lists. It is unclear whether list length or sentence complexity affects these results. In the present study, we attempted to define the critical point at which the interacting conditions of list length and sentence complexity produce or fail to produce the bizarre sentence effect (BSE). We utilized a factorial design composed of two sentence-length and three mixed list-length conditions. The BSE was consistently found for each list length in the simple sentence condition but not in the complex sentence condition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cox, S. D., Wollen, K. A. (1981). Bizarreness and recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 244–245.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1987). Distinctiveness and the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 78–102). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., & Cote, N. (1988, November). Factors controlling the bizarreness effect. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., & Lackey, S. (1989). Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 137–146.
Hirshman, E., Whelley, M. M., & Palu, M. (1989). An investigation of paradoxical effects. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 594–609.
Hunt, R. R, & Elliott, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects upon retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 49–74.
Imai, S., & Richman, C. L. (1989). Bizarreness: An initial approach to definition. Unpublished manuscript. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
Kroll, N. E., Schepeler, E. M., & Angin, K. T. (1986). Bizarre imagery: The misremembered mnemonic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 42–54.
Kroll, N. E., & Tu, S.-F. (1988). The bizarre mnemonic. Psychological Research, 50, 28–37.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 54–65.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1989). Sentence complexity eliminates the mnemonic advantage of bizarre imagery. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 117–120.
Nelson, D. L. (1979). Remembering pictures and words: Appearance, significance and name. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Level of processing in human memory (pp. 45–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pra Baldi, A., deBeni, R., Cornoldi, C., & Cavedon, A. (1985). Some conditions for the occurrence of the bizarreness effect in free recall. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 427–436.
Wollen, K. A., & Cox, S. (1981). The bizarreness effect in a multi-trial intentional learning task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 296–298.
Wollen, K. A., & Margres, M. G. (1987). Bizarreness and the imagery multiprocess modes. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 103-127). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Wake Forest University Research and Publication Fund. We thank Ron Cobb, Gilles Einstein, and Satomi Imai for their helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richman, C.L., Dunn, J., Kahl, G. et al. The bizarre sentence effect as a function of list length and complexity. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 28, 185–187 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333998
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333998