Abstract
The existence of phantom motion aftereffects (MAEs) makes it difficult to explain normal MAEs in terms of the activity of simple motion detectors. The alternative is to assume that MAEs are mediated by larger structures that respond more broadly to stimulus input. In this view, normal and phantom MAEs are manifestations of activation of a single structure and, therefore, should not differ in their qualitative and quantitative properties. This hypothesis was tested in two experiments, one that used experienced subjects and one that used naive subjects. The adapting stimulus was the upper half of a rotating spiral. Normal spiral aftereffects (SAEs) were observed over the upper half of a set of concentric circles; phanton SAEs were observed over the lower-half semicircles. Subjects continuously rated the strength of the aftereffect on an 11-point scale. The ratings were recorded every 5 sec. All subjects reported seeing normal and phantom SAEs in the appropriate respective directions. Rates of recovery from adaptation were remarkably similar. The results support the hypothesis that normal and phantom SAEs are a manifestation of activity in a structure larger than a simple motion detector.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barlow, H. B., & Hill, R. M. (1963). Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural after-effects. Nature, 200, 1345–1347.
Beverley, K. I., & Regan, D. (1979). Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms? Vision Research, 19, 727–732.
Bonnet, C., & Pouthas, V. (1972). Interactions between spatial and kinetic dimensions in movement aftereffect. Perception & Psy-chophysics, 12, 193–200.
Cavanagh, P., & Favreau, O. E. (1980). Motion aftereffect: A global mechanism for the perception of rotation. Perception, 9, 175–182.
Erke, H., & Graser, H. (1972). Reversibility of perceived motion: Selective adaptation of the human visual system to speed, size and orientation. Vision Research, 12, 69–87.
Favreau, O. E. (1981). Evidence for parallel processing in motion perception. Acta Psychologica, 48, 25–34.
Goldstein, A. G. (1958). On the after-effects of the waterfall and spiral illusions. American Journal of Psychology, 71, 608–609.
Hershenson, M. (1982). Moon illusion and spiral aftereffect: Illusions due to the loom-zoom system? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 423–440.
Milligan, W. L., & Scott, T. R. (1971). On the geometry of spiral aftereffect. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 389–392.
Regan, D. (1982). Visual information channeling in normal and disordered vision. Psychological Review, 89, 407–444.
Regan, D., & Beverley, K. I. (1978a). Illusory motion in depth: Aftereffect of adaptation to changing size. Vision Research, 18, 209–212.
Regan, D., & Beverley, K. I. (1978b). Looming detectors in the human visual pathway. Vision Research, 19, 415–421.
Regan, D., & Beverley, K. I. (1979). Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage. Vision Research, 19, 1331–1342.
Scott, T. R., & Noland, J. H. (1965). Some stimulus dimension of rotating spirals. Psychological Review, 72, 344–357.
Sekuler, R., & Pantle, A. (1967). A model for after-effects of seen motion. Vision Research, 7, 427–439.
Sutherland, N. S. (1961). Figural aftereffects and apparent size. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 222–228.
Weisstein, N., Maguire, W., & Berbaum, K. (1977). A phantom-motion aftereffect. Science, 198, 955–958.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This project was supported in part by Grant BRSG S07 RR07044 awarded by the Biomedical Research Support Grant Program, Division of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health. I thank J. Wodinsky and C. Fox.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hershenson, M. Phantom spiral aftereffect: Evidence for global mechanisms in perception. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 22, 535–537 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333900
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333900