Abstract
A retroactive inhibition design was employed to study the role of rules in paired-associate learning and retention. Subjects first learned one of three unmixed lists of paired nonsense syllables. A rule applied to all items in two of the lists: Pair members changed first letter (rhymed) or changed middle letter. In the third list, pair members were not related. A common second list was learned, and either a first-list recall test or a four-alternative forced-choice recognition test followed. First-list learning and recall were superior for lists with rules. Recognition, which did not show a ceiling effect, was not superior for lists with rules when both target and distractors followed a rule. The results supported the hypothesis that rules facilitate retrieval rather than storage, and that they do so to the extent that they reduce response-set size.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bower, G. H., & Bolton, L. S. (1969). Why are rhymes easy to learn? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 453–461.
D’Amato, M. F., & Guber, S. (1982). Rules and paired-associate retention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 110.
D’Amato, M. F., & Rubenstein, V. (1981). Response-set size and paired-associate learning. Psychological Reports, 48, 172–174.
Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–67.
Hunt, R. R., Elliot, J. M., & Spence, M. J. (1979). Independent effects of process and structure on encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 339–347.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Friedrich, M. A. (1982). Ex-tralist cuing and retrieval inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 89–105.
Underwood, B. J. (1982). Paired associate learning: Data on pair difficulty and variables that influence difficulty. Memory & Cognition, 10, 610–617.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Amato, M.F., Marchese, A. Response-set size effects in recall and recognition. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 22, 503–506 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333891
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333891