Subjects either named or made lexical decisions about words presented in parafoveal vision. In one condition, subjects were required to maintain fixation, and in another condition, they were allowed to make eye movements. In the no eye movement condition, performance decreased as the stimulus was presented further from fixation. Words could be identified more quickly when eye movements were made than when they were not. The experiments also indicated that holding fixation takes up a certain amount of processing capacity, so that foveally presented targets are identified more quickly when eye movements are allowed than when they are not.
Andriessen, J. J., & Bouma, H. Eccentric vision: Adverse interaction between line segments. Vision Research, 1976, 16, 71–78.
Bouma, H. Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 1973, 13, 767–782.
Bouma, H. Visual search and reading: Eye movements and functional visual field. In J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Hilz, R., & Cavonius, C. R. Functional organization of the peripheral retina: Sensitivity to periodic stimuli. Vision Research, 1974, 14, 1333–1337.
Hines, M. Line spread function variation near the fovea. Vision Research, 1976, 16, 567–572.
Koenderink, J. J., Bouman, M. A., Bueno de Mesquita, A. E., & Slappendel, S. Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. 1. The near peripheral visual field (eccentricity 0°-8°). Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1978, 68, 845–849.
Limb, J. O., & Rubenstein, C. B. A model of threshold vision incorporating inhomogeneity of the visual field. Vision Research, 1977, 17, 571–584.
Mackworth, N. H. Visual noise causes tunnel vision. Psychonomic Science, 1965, 3, 67–68.
Millodot, M. Foveal and extra-foveal acuity with and without stabilized retinal images. British Journal of Physiological Optics, 1966, 23, 75–106.
Rayner, K. Eye movement latencies for parafoveally presented words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978, 11, 13–16.
Rayner, K., & McConkie, G. W. What guides a reader’s eye movements? Vision Research, 1976, 16, 829–837.
Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Ehrlich, S. Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978, 4, 529–544.
Sanders, A. F. The selective process in the functional visual field. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception, RVO-TNO, 1963.
Schiepers, C. Response latency and accuracy in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 1980, 27, 71–81.
This research was supported by Grant HD12727 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development We would like to thank Arnold Well and Alexander Pollatsek for their assistance and comments on the paper.
About this article
Cite this article
Rayner, K., Morrison, R.E. Eye movements and identifying words in parafoveal vision. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 17, 135–138 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333690
- Lexical Decision
- Visual Angle
- Vision Research
- Lexical Decision Task
- Naming Task