Abstract
Redundancy was varied in the tachistoscopic full-report procedure. Unlike previous experiments using the detection paradigm, redundancy led to a detriment in performance. Evidence is presented that response bias was not the cause of the detriment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Gardner, G. T. Spatial processing characteristics in the perception of brief visual arrays. Human Performance Center Technical Report No. 23 (Doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, 1970.
Estes, W. K. Interaction of signal and background variables in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 12, 278–286.
Wolford, G. L., Wessel, D. L., & Estes, W. K. Further evidence concerning scanning and sampling assumptions of visual detection modeles. Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 439–444.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The project reported herein was performed pursuant to a grant from the U.S. Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The opinions expressed herein, however, do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S. Office of Education, and no official endorsement by the U.S. Office of Education should be inferred. This article was written while the first author was visiting the Center for Human Information Processing at the University of California, San Diego. The center (under partial support from NIMH Grant MH-15828) was generous in its assistance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolford, G., Hollingsworth, S. Redundancy in the full-report procedure. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 3, 457–458 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333527
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333527