Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
  3. Article
Positive discrimination contrast with delay of reward or low drive
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Conditioned Reinforcement: the Effectiveness of Stimulus—Stimulus Pairing and Operant Discrimination Procedures

12 September 2018

Monica Vandbakk, Heidi Skorge Olaff & Per Holth

Blocking of Stimulus Control and Conditioned Reinforcement

31 March 2020

Monica Vandbakk, Heidi Skorge Olaff & Per Holth

Pigeons can learn a difficult discrimination if reinforcement is delayed following choice

21 February 2020

Dalton House, Daniel Peng & Thomas R. Zentall

Enhancing “self-control”: The paradoxical effect of delay of reinforcement

05 February 2020

Thomas R. Zentall

Associative structure of conditioned inhibition produced by inhibitory perceptual learning treatment

12 November 2018

Cody W. Polack & Ralph R. Miller

Pigeons’ midsession reversal: Greater magnitude of reinforcement on the first half of the session leads to improved accuracy

22 July 2020

Peyton M. Mueller & Thomas R. Zentall

Gradient Shift is Sensitive to the Width of the Generalization Test Range

25 March 2019

Adam Derenne

Midsession reversal learning by pigeons: Effect on accuracy of increasing the number of stimuli associated with one of the alternatives

16 August 2019

Thomas R. Zentall, Daniel N. Peng, … Ryan Yadav

The push and pull of dopamine in cue-reward learning

08 February 2019

Sean B. Ostlund

Download PDF
  • Published: 05 November 2013

Positive discrimination contrast with delay of reward or low drive

  • Richard S. Calef1,
  • Ruth Ann B. Calef1,
  • Frederick R. Maxwell2 &
  • …
  • Earl R. McHewitt3 

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society volume 6, pages 120–122 (1975)Cite this article

  • 197 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

In the present study, six groups of 10 albino rats each were given differential conditioning training in parallel alleys differing only in brightness. The results showed a positive S+ contrast effect when 20-sec delay of reinforcement or lowered drive (12-h deprivation) were used to lower responding, but a negative S+ contrast effect when subjects received both immediate reinforcement and 23-h deprivation. No present theory can adequately explain both effects.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Benefield, R., Oseos, A., & Ehrenfreund, D. Role of Frustration in successive positive contrast. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974, 86, 648–651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. W. Shifts in magnitude of reward and contrast effects in instrumental and selective learning: A reinterpretation. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 114–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. A contrast effect in differential conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 62, 196–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, P. J. Contrasted conditions of reinforcement: A selective critique. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 295–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfreund, D. Effect of drive on successive magnitude shift in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971, 76, 418–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K. Within-subjects partial reinforcement effects in acquisition and in later discrimination training. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 72, 704–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigson, H. W., & Gay, R. A. An investigation of conditions determining contrast effects in differential reward conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 75, 37–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. R. Interactive effect of the two rewards in a differential magnitude of reward discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 75, 329–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McHose, J. H. Relative reinforcement effects: S1 /S2 and S1 /S1 paradigms in instrumental conditioning. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellgren, R. L., Wrather, D. M., & Dyck, D. G. Differential conditioning and contrast effects in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972, 80, 478–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shanab, M. E., Sander, R., & Premack, D. Positive contrast in the runway obtained with delay of reward. Science, 1969, 164, 724–725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shanab, M. E., & White, R. Positive contrast obtained with punishment. Journal of General Psychology, 1972, 86, 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. West Virginia Wesleyan College, Buckhannon, West Virginia, 26201

    Richard S. Calef & Ruth Ann B. Calef

  2. Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri, 65302

    Frederick R. Maxwell

  3. King College, Bristol, Tennessee, 37620

    Earl R. McHewitt

Authors
  1. Richard S. Calef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruth Ann B. Calef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frederick R. Maxwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Earl R. McHewitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper is sponsored by James McHose, who takes full editorial responsibility for its contents. The authors wish to express thanks to Chris Mundy for typing the manuscript and to Irving Calef, the first author’s father, for constructing the apparatus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calef, R.S., Calef, R.A.B., Maxwell, F.R. et al. Positive discrimination contrast with delay of reward or low drive. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 6, 120–122 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333165

Download citation

  • Received: 29 March 1975

  • Published: 05 November 2013

  • Issue Date: July 1975

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333165

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Contrast Effect
  • Large Reward
  • Positive Contrast
  • Differential Conditioning
  • Deprivation Schedule
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 167.114.118.212

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.