Abstract
In a 2 by 2 factorial design, 48 albino rats were trained in a straight runway to receive either a large or a small magnitude of immediate or delayed reward, after which all groups received the large reward for an additional phase of training. The groups receiving immediate reinforcement performed more rapidly than the delayed groups throughout the experiment. The effects for reward magnitude were complex, and there was some suggestion that delayed reinforcement produced a reversal of the usual superior performance for a large reward. While delayed upshifted subjects briefly overshot the performance level of large-reward controls, group differences were not reliable, and this failure to obtain a positive contrast effect did not seem to be due to a physiological limit.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Black, R. W. Shifts in magnitude of reward and contrast effects in instrumental and selective learning: A reinterpretation. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 114–126.
Black, R. W. Incentive motivation and the parameters of reward in instrumental appetitive conditioning. In W. Arnold (Ed.), The Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1969.
Chechile, R., & Fowler, H. Primary and secondary negative incentive contrast in differential conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 97, 189–197.
Dunham, P. J. Contrasted conditions of reinforcement: A selected critique. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 295–315.
Gavelek, J. R., & McHose, J. H. Contrast effects in differential delay of reward conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 86, 454–457.
McCain, G., Dyleski, K., & McElvain, G. Reward magnitude and instrumental responses: Consistent reward. Psychonomic Science Monograph Supplements, 1971, 3, No. 16 (Whole No. 48), 249–256.
McHose, J. H., & Tauber, L. Changes in delay of reinforcement in simple instrumental conditioning. Psychonomic Science, 1972, 27, 291–292.
Mellgren, R. L. Positive contrast in the rat as a function of number of preshift trials in the runway. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971, 77, 329–336.
Mellgren, R. L. Positive and negative contrast effects using delayed reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 1972, 3, 185–193.
Mellgren, R. L., Wrather, D. M., & Dyck, D. G. Differential conditioning and contrast effects in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972, 80, 478–483.
Shanab, M. E., & McCuistion, S. Effects of shifts in magnitude and delay of reward upon runway performance in the rat. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 21, 264–266.
Shanab, M. E., Rouse, L. O., & Cavallaro, G. Effects of shifts in delay of reward in rats as a function of reward magnitude. The Journal of General Psychology, 1973, 89, 59–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to thank Karen Hall and Judy Lawson for their assistance in running the subjects.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, W.M., Black, R.W. Shifts in magnitude of delayed and immediate reward. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 6, 35–38 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333137
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333137