Abstract
Rats with total removal of neocortex (neodecorticates), hippocampectomized rats (hippocampals), and their controls were trained on a differential reinforcement of low-rate 12-sec (DRL12) schedule. With training, neodecorticates reduced the frequency of short interresponse times (ERTs) and increased the frequency of longer IRTs. They also significantly reduced the interresponse time per opportunity ratio for short IRTs and significantly increased the ratio in the period following reinforcement availability. Between-group differences on measures of IRT distribution, IRT per opportunity, and postreinforcement delay suggest separate contributions by neocortex and hippocampus to observed behavior on this task. Performance deficits in the lesioned groups are interpreted in terms of the associative power of the predictive lever increasing the pressure to respond in neodecorticates and the possible loss of place learning in both neodecorticates and hippocampals. In conjunction with previous work, these results indicate that temporal sensitivity in the rat is not destroyed by total neodecortication.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anger, D. (1956). The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 145–161
Blackman, D. (1979). Operant conditioning: An experimental analysis of behaviour. London: Methuen.
Cohen, L., & Holliday, M. (1983). Statistics for social scientists. London: Harper & Row.
Davey, G. (1981). Animal learning and conditioning. London: Macmillan.
Eames, L., & Oakley, D. A. (1979). Differential autoshaping to visual stimuli in neodecorticated rats. IRCS Medical Science, 7, 88.
Eames, L., & Oakley, D. A. (1985). Neocortex, hippocampus and performance in Lashley’s maze III. In B. E. Will, P. Schmidt, & J. C. Dairymple-Alford (Eds.), Brain plasticity learning and memory (Advances in Behavioural Biology, Vol. 28, pp. 373–381). New York: Plenum.
Goldstein, L. H., & Oakley, D. A. (1985). Expected and actual behavioural capacity after diffuse reduction in cerebral cortex: A review and suggestions for rehabilitative techniques with the mentally handicapped and head injured. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 13–24.
Goldstein, L. H., & Oakley, D. A. (1987). Visual discrimination in the absence of visual cortex. Behavioural Brain Research, 24, 181–193.
Howell, D. C. (1982). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: Duxbury Press.
Jaldow, E. J., Oakley, D. A., & Davey, G. C. L. (1989). Performance of decorticated rats on fixed interval and fixed time schedules. European Journal of Neuroscience, 1, 461–470.
Jaldow, E. J., Oakley, D. A., & Davey, G. C. L. (1990). Performance on two fixed interval schedules in the absence of neocortex in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 763–777.
Kolb, B., Sutherland, R. J., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1983). A comparison of the contributions of the frontal and parietal association cortex to spatial localization in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 97, 13–27.
Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1981). Decortication of rats in infancy or adulthood produced comparable functional losses on learned and species-typical behaviors. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 95, 468–483.
Laties, V. G., Weiss, B., Clark, R. L., & Reynolds, M. D. (1965). Overt “mediating” behavior during temporally spaced responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8, 107–116.
Laties, V. G., Weiss, B., & Weiss, A. B. (1969). Further observations on overt “mediating” behavior and the discrimination of time. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 43–57.
Meck, W. H. (1988). Hippocampal function is required for feedback control of an internal clock’s criterion. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 54–60.
Oakley, D. A. (1979a). Cerebral cortex and adaptive behaviour. In D. A. Oakley & H. C. Plotkin (Eds.), Brain, behaviour and evolution (pp. 154–188). London: Methuen.
Oakley, D. A. (1979b). Learning with food reward and shock avoidance in neodecorticate rats. Experimental Neurology, 63, 627–642.
Oakley, D. A. (1980). Improved instrumental learning in neodecorticate rats. Physiology & Behavior, 24, 357–366.
O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Olton, D. S. (1983). Memory functions and the hippocampus. In W. Seifert (Ed.), Neurobiology of the hippocampus (pp. 335–373). London: Academic Press.
Olton, D. S., Meck, W. H., & Church, R. M. (1987). Separation of hippocampal and amygdaloid involvement in temporal memory dysfunctions. Brain Research, 404, 180–188.
Richelle, M., & Lejeune, H. (1980). Time in animal behaviour. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Sidman, M. (1955). Technique for assessing the effects of drugs on timing behavior. Science, 122, 925.
Sutherland, R. J., Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1982). Spatial mapping: Definitive disruption by hippocampal or medial frontal cortical damage in the rat. Neuroscience Letters, 31, 271–276.
Terry, P., Herbert, B. A., & Oakley, D. A. (1989). Anomalous patterns of response learning and transfer in decorticate rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 33, 105–109.
Terry, P., & Oakley, D. A. (1990). The effects of cortical or hippocampal damage on behavioral flexibility in the rat. Psychobiology, 18, 404–415.
Whishaw, I. Q., & Kolb, B. (1984). Decortication abolishes place but not cue learning in rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 11, 123–134.
Whishaw, I. Q., Schallert, T., & Kolb, B. (1981). An analysis of feeding and sensorimotor abilities of rats after decortication. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 95, 85–103.
Zimmerman, J., & Schuster, C. R. (1962). Spaced responding in multiple DRL schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 497–504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by a Science and Engineering Research Council Studentship (Award No. 80311655) to E.J.J.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaldow, E.J., OAkley, D.A. Performance on a differential reinforcement of low-rate schedule in neodecorticated rats and rats with hippocampal lesions. Psychobiology 18, 394–403 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333086
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333086