Abstract
A controversy has arisen between cognitive dissonance researchers and self-perception theory advocates regarding the relevance of premanipulation attitudes to postmanipulation attitudes in dissonance experiments. The present study attempted to test the relevance of premanipulation attitudes to postmanipulation attitudes by preselecting Ss for a forced-compliance experiment on the bais of the extremity of their premanipulation attitudes concerning a particular topic. It was found that Ss with extreme premanipulation attitudes differed significantly in their postmanipulation attitudes from Ss with neutral premanipulation attitudes. In addition, the extreme premanipulation attitude Ss demonstrated significantly greater attitude change than did the neutral premanipulation attitude Ss. After ruling out a regression effect explanation of the greater change in the extreme premanipulation attitude Ss, the results were interpreted as consistent with cognitive dissonance theory predictions and as nonsupportive of self-perception theory assumptions that premanipulation attitudes are not relevant to postmanipulation attitudes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
BEM, D. J. An experimental analysis of beliefs and attitudes, (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan) Ann Arbor, Mich: University Microfilms, 1964. No. 64–12,558.
BEM, D. J. An experimental analysis of self-persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 199–218.
BEM, D. J. Inducing beliefs in false confessions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 707–710.
BEM, D. J. Reply to Judson Mills. Psychological Review, 1967a, 74, 536–537.
BEM, D. J. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 1967b, 74, 183–200.
BEM, D. J. Self-perception: The dependent variable of human performance. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 1967c, 2, 105–121.
BEM, D. J. Attitudes as self descriptions: Another look at the attitude behavior link. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, and T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1968a. Pp. 197–215.
BEM, D. J. The epistemologica! status of interpersonal simulations: A reply to Jones, Linder, Kiesler, Zanna and Brehm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1968b, 4, 270–274.
BEM, D. J., & McCONNELL, H. K. Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1970, 14, 23–31.
CHRIS, S., & WOODYARD, H. D. Characteristics of premanipulation attitudes and self-perception: A test of Bern’s theory. Presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, ontreal, 1972.
FESTINGER, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, Ill: Row, Peterson, 1957.
FESTINGER, L. Conflict, decision and dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964.
HARVEY, J., & MILLS, J. Effect of a difficult opportunity to revoke a counterattitudinal action upon attitude change. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1971, 18, 201–209.
JONES, R. A., LINDER, D. E., KIESLER, C. A., ZANNA, M., & BREHM, J. W. Internal states or external stimuli: Observers’ attitude judgments and the dissonance-theory self-perception controversy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1968, 4, 247–260.
MILLS, J. Comment on Bern’s “Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.” Psychological Review, 1967, 74,535.
SKINNER, B. F. Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
WOODYARD, H. D. Some tests of the self-perception hypothesis. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida) Ann Arbor, Mich: University Microfilms, 1968. No. 69–17,051.
WOODYARD, H. D. A test of self-perception: Experiment I. Proceedings, 77th Annual Convention, APA, 1969a, 313–314.
WOODYARD, H. D. A test of self -perception: Experiment II. Proceedings, 77th Annual Convention, APA, 1969b, 327–328.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Canada Council Grant 69-0801.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woodyard, H.D. Self-perception, dissonance, and premanipulation attitudes. Psychon Sci 29, 193–196 (1972). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332824
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332824