Abstract
College students solved simple concept-identification problems in which feedback was contingent on their current hypothesis (H). No dimension was consistently labeled until Ss pattern of responses over a block of stimuli indicated that he was using the solution H. The results indicated that some Ss were pure H testers, choosing new Hs on the basis of local consistency; these Ss had little difficulty with their problems. The remaining Ss evidently tried to integrate the unreliable feedback information over more than one trial and found their problems quite difficult or impossible to solve.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
BOURNE, L. E., JR., & RESTLE, F. Mathematical theory of concept identification. Psychological Review, 1959, 66, 278–296.
BOWER, G., & TRABASSO, T. Concept identification. In R. C. Atkinson (Ed.), Studies in mathematical psychology. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1964. Pp. 32–96.
ERICKSON, J. R. Hypothesis sampling in concept identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 76, 12–18.
GREGG, L. W., & SIMON, H. A. Process models and stochastic theories of simple concept formation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1967, 4, 246–276.
LEVINE, M. Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 71, 331–338.
RESTLE, F. The selection of strategies in cue learning. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 329–343.
TRABASSO, T., & BOWER, G. H. Presolution dimensional shifts in concept identification: A test of the cue-sampling axiom. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966, 3, 163–173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was carried out at the Human Performance Center and was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant No. MH-12113-02.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erickson, J.R., Block, K.K. Concept identification with reinforcement of hypotheses and misinformative stimulus labeling. Psychon Sci 14, 183–184 (1969). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332779
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332779