Abstract
A series of figures differing in complexity were exposed to 44 nursing students. Ss were monitored for GSR and heart rate while they looked at each figure for as long as they wished. They then rated each figure on 20 semantic differential-type scales. The data were factor analyzed by the principal axis method, with communalities iterated by refactoring followed by varimax rotation. Four factors were extracted and the first three were identified as Osgood’s activity, evaluative, and potency factors. It was suggested that the activity factor relates to arousal-raising stimulus properties, while the evaluative factor relates to arousal-reducing or -restraining stimulus properties.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
BERLYNE, D. E. Conflict and information-theory variables as determinants of human perceptual curiosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 53, 399–404.
BERLYNE, D. E. Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1963, 17, 274–290.
BERLYNE, D. E., CRAW, M. A., SALAPATEK, P. H., & LEWIS, J. L. Novelty, complexity, incongruity, extrinsic motivation and the G.S.R. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 560–567.
BERLYNE, D. E., & LAWRENCE, G. H. Effects of complexity and incongruity variables on G.S.R., investigatory behaviors, and verbally expressed preference. Journal of General Psychology, 1964, 71, 21–45.
BERLYNE, D. E. & PECKHAM, S. The semantic differential and other measures of reaction to visual complexity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1966, 20, 125–135.
DAY, H. Looking time as a function of stimulus variables and individual differences. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1966, 22, 423–428.
DAY, H. A subjective definition of complexity. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1967a, 25, 583–584.
DAY, H. Evaluations of subjective complexity, pleasingness and interestingness for a series of random polygons varying in complexity. Perception & Psycho physics, 1967b, 2, 281–286.
DAY, H. Preference: Interest or pleasure? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psycholoigcal Association, Calgary, 1968a.
DAY, H. Some determinants of looking time under different instructional sets. Perception & Psychophysics, 1968b, 4, 279–281.
DAY, H. The importance of symmetry and complexity in the evaluation of complexity, interest, and pleasingness. Psychonomic Science, 1968c, 10, 339–340.
DAY, H. The measurement of specific curiosity. Paper read at Symposium on Intrinsic Motivation in Education, Toronto, June 1970.
EDWARDS, A. L. Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960.
HARMAN, H. Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
KAISER, H. F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 187–200.
LACEY, J. I. Somatic response patterning and stress: Some revisions of activation theory. In M. H. Appley and R. Trumbull (Eds.), Psychological stress: Issues in research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1
OPTON, E., JR., RANKIN, N. O., & LAZARUS, R. S. A simplified method of heart rate measurement. Psychophysiology, 1966, 2, 87–97.
OSGOOD, C. E., SUCI, G. J., & TANNENBAUM, P. H, The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Ill: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
SLANKIS, I. V. The relations between verbal judgements of pleasingness and choice behavior, and between verbal judgements of interestingness and exploration time. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Toronto, 1965.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, D.R., Day, H.I. The factorial structure of responses to perceptual complexity. Psychon Sci 22, 357–359 (1971). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332619
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332619