Abstract
The verbal-loop hypothesis (VLH) was examined, using a within-S design, a perceptual recognition task, and a set of patterns of respectable pictorial quality. No significant relationship between verbalization and recognition accuracy was found.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
GLANZER, M., & CLARK, W. H. Accuracy of perceptual recall: An analysis of organization. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1962, 1, 289–299.
GLANZER, M., & CLARK, W. H. The verbal-loop hypothesis: Binary numbers. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1963, 2, 301–309.
GLANZER, M., & CLARK, W. H. The verbal-loop hypothesis: Conventional figures. American Journal of Psychology, 1964, 77, 621–626.
ROSS, J. The verbal-loop hypothesis: A statistical audit. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1968, 20, 233–235.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sang, D.L., Ross, J. The verbal-loop hypothesis (VLH): A within-subject study with a perceptual recognition task. Psychon Sci 18, 345–347 (1970). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332391
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332391