Abstract
The performances of Chukars, Ringneck doves and Greater Hill mynas on successive discrimination reversals were studied under conditions of correction and non-correction. Correction procedures significantly elevated the error scores of the doves and mynas, but did not affect Chukar scores.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Behrend, Erika, Domesick, Valerie & Bitterman, M. E. Habit reversal in the fish. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1965, 60, 407–411.
Bitterman, M. E. The evolution of intelligence. Scient. American, 1965, 212, 92–100.
Gossette, R., Gossette, Madeliene, & Riddell, W. Comparisons of successive discrimination reversal performances among closely and remotely related avian species. Anim. Behav., 1966, 14, 560–564.
Gossette, R. Comparison of successive discrimination reversal performances across 14 different avian and mammalian species. Amer. Zool., 1966, 6, (Abstract).
Setterington, R. G., & Bishop, H. E. Habit reversal improvement in the fish. Psychon. Sci., 1967, 7, 41–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
2. This work was supported by NIMH grant MN 111806-01.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gossette, R.L., Hood, P. Successive discrimination reversal (SDR) performances of Chukars, Ringneck doves and Greater Hill Mynas as a function of correction as opposed to non-correction procedures. Psychon Sci 8, 361–362 (1967). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332240
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332240