Abstract
Eye movements were monitored as Ss learned lists of high (Group H) and low (Group L) intraresponse similarity. The learning for Group L was superior, with the fixation functions of both groups resembling those of previous studies. Group H appeared to move more rapidly from Stage 1 to Stage 2 even though their consolidation of the responses seemed to be incomplete.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Haltrecht, E. J., & McCormack, P. D. Monitoring eye movements of slow and fast learners. Psychon. Sci., 1966, 6, 461–462.
Mackworth, N. H., & Thomas, E. L. Head-mounted eye-marker camera. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1962, 52, 713–716.
McCormack, P. D., & Haltrecht, E. J. Monitoring eye movements under two conditions of presentation of paired-associate materials. Canad. J. Psychol., 1966, 20, 154–159.
Underwood, B. J., Runquist, W. N., & Schulz, R. W. Response learning in paired-associate lists as a function of intralist similarity. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 58, 70–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Note
1. This research was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Associate Committee on Experimental Psychology of the National Research Council of Canada (Grant APA-78).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCormack, P.D., Hannah, T.E., Bradley, W.J. et al. Monitoring eye movements under conditions of high and low intralist response (meaningful) similarity. Psychon Sci 8, 517–518 (1967). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03331729
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03331729