Abstract
It is suggested that Goldstein’s data on Troxler’s effect reflect the influence of eye-movement rather than the variables specified by the author. An alternative test of Goldstein’s retinal interaction hypothesis is briefly outlined.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
CLARKE, F. J. J., & BELCHER, S. J. On the localization of Troxler’s effect in the visual pathway. Vis. Res., 1962, 2, 53–68.
DITCHBURN, R. W., & FENDER, D. H. The stabilized retinal image. Optica Acta, 1955, 2, 128–133.
FRY, G. A., & ROBERTSON, V. M. The physiological basis of the periodic merging of area into background. Amer. J. Psychol., 1935, 45, 644–655.
GERRITS, H. J. M., DE HAAN, B., & VENDRIK, A. J. H. Experiments with retinal stabilized images. Relations between observations and neural data. Vis. Res., 1966, 6, 427–440.
GOLDSTEIN, A. G. Retinal rivalry and Troxler’s effect. Psychon. Sci., 1967, 7, 427–428.
GUILFORD, J. P. Fluctuations of attention with weak visual stimuli. Amer. J. Psychol., 1927, 38, 534–535.
RIGGS, L. A., RATLIFF, F., CORNSWEET, J. C., & CORNSWEET, T. N. The disappearance of steadily fixated test objects. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1953, 53, 110–120.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirkwood, B. Comment on Goldstein: Retinal rivalry and Troxler’s effect. Psychon Sci 11, 54 (1968). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330987
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330987