Abstract
In this study, we investigated the possibility that a response bias might be responsible for the typical pattern of responding observed when people reason about artificial relationships, especially set inclusions. Experiment 1 provided strong evidence for the proposed bias, since subjects tended to respond as if an unspecified relationship were symmetrical and increasingly intransitive over inferential distance. However, Experiment 2, using extended syllogisms, showed that not all relationships lead to such responding. Although the majority of the quantified relationships were responded to as if they were symmetrical, most were also regarded as transitive. Thus, the response bias idea, although of some interest, cannot provide a complete explanation of performance on these tasks.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Borges, M. A., & Sawyers, B. K. (1974). Common verbal quantifiers: Usage and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 335–338.
DeSoto, C. B., & Kuethe, J. L. (1959). Subjective probabilities of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 59, 290–294.
Griggs, R. A. (1976). Logical processing of set inclusion relations in meaningful text. Memory & Cognition, 4, 730–740.
Mynatt, B. T., & Smith, K. H. (1979). Processing of text containing artificial inclusion relations. Memory & Cognition, 7, 390–400.
Newstead, S. E., & Griggs, R. A. (1984). Fuzzy quantifiers as an explanation of set inclusion performance. Psychological Research, 46, 377–388.
Potts, G. R. (1978). The role of inference in memory for real and artificial information. In R. Revlin & R. E. Mayer (Eds.), Human reasoning (pp. 139–161). Washington, DC: Winston.
Tsal, Y. (1977). Symmetry and transitivity assumptions about a nonspecified logical relation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 677–684.
Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content.London: Batsford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors thank Ray Burke for his assistance in generating the experimental materials for Experiment 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newstead, S.E., Pollard, P. & Griggs, R.A. Response bias in relational reasoning. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 24, 95–98 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330514
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330514