Abstract
If rats in a T-maze made an arbitrarily designated correct response, that response was the terminal trial of the day. If, instead, they made the other incorrect response, they were shocked on the next trial whenever they failed to choose either arm of the maze within 3 sec. All rats quickly learned to choose one arm, but the incorrect arm was chosen as often as the correct. Thus the original hypothesis that escape from shock in conjunction with the tendency to alternate would mediate the learning of the correct response was not supported. However, the animals that learned the incorrect response had a much weaker tendency to alternate on shock trials than had the learners of the correct response. Fourteen of the 16 subjects fixated on the arm to which they went when first shocked, which seems consistent with elicitation theory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Coover, G. D., Sutton, B. R., Welle, S. L., & Hart, R. P. (1978). Corticosterone responses, hurdle-jump acquisition, and the effects of dexamethasone using classical conditioning of fear. Hormones & Behavior, 11, 279–294.
Denny, M. R. (1971). A theory of experimental extinction and its relation to a general theory. In H. Kendler & J. Spence (Eds.), Essays in neobehaviorism: A memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Denny, M. R. (1979). Long delay learning in a T-maze. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 1, 135–142.
Denny, M. R., & Adelman, H. S. (1955). Elicitation theory: I. An analysis of two typical learning situations. Psychological Review, 51, 87–93.
Epstein, R. (1985). Extinction-induced resurgence: Preliminary investigations and possible applications. The Psychological Record, 35, 143–153.
Everall, E. E. (1935). Perseveration in the rat. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19, 343–369.
Grice, G. R. (1948). The relation of secondary reinforcement to delayed reward in visual discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 1–16.
Hamilton, J. A., & Krechevsky, I. (1933). Studies in the effect of shock upon behavior plasticity in the rat. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 16, 237–253.
Lett, B. T. (1973). Delayed reward learning: Disproof of the traditional theory. Learning & Motivation, 4, 237–246.
Lett, B. T. (1975). Long delay learning in the T-maze. Learning & Motivation, 6, 80–90.
Lett, B. T. (1979). Long-delay learning: Implications for learning and memory theory. In N. S. Sutherland (Ed.), Tutorial essay in psychology: A guide to recent advances (Vol. 2). New York: Halstead Press.
Maier, N. R. F., Glaser, N. W., & Klee, J. B. (1940). Studies of abnormal behavior in the rat: III. The development of behavior fixations through frustration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 521–546.
O’Kelly, L. I. (1940). An experimental study of regression: II. Some motivational determinants of regression and perseveration. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 30, 55–95.
Sanders, M. J. (1937). An experimental demonstration of regression in the rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 493–510.
Senkowski, P., & Denny, M. R. (1977). Frustration-mediated learning of a barpress response. Animal Learning & Behavior, 5, 373–376.
Staddon, F. E. R., & Simmelhag, V. L. (1971). The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors are indebted to Debbie Halstead for helping to collect the data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hillix, W.A., Denny, M.R. Learning produced by escape and spontaneous alternation. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 24, 69–71 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330506
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330506