Abstract
Williams (1989) reported that discrimination learning and its reversal in the operant chamber are regulated by the number of reinforcements to the S+ alternative independently of reinforcement schedule, a finding Williams called the invariance effect. To determine whether there is an invariance effect in the runway, we trained four groups of rats on a successive brightness discrimination problem and its reversal. The experimental design was a factorial combination of two reinforcement schedules associated with S+ (partial reinforcement, PRF, vs. consistent reinforcement, CRF) and the number of trials per day to S+ (five vs. seven). The design provided one PRF group and one CRF group given the same number of reinforcements to S+. It also provided for a comparison between two PRF groups given different percentages of reinforcement in S+, and for PRF and CRF groups given the same number of trials in S+. PRF impaired both original discrimination learning and reversal learning whether PRF and CRF groups were equated for number of trials or for number of reinforcements, and learning was not affected by the percentage of reinforcement difference between the two PRF groups. Thus, no invariance effect was obtained.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amsel, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 102–119.
Amsel, A. (1962). Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: Some recent history and a theoretical extension. Psychological Review, 69, 306–328.
Capaldi, E. J. (1966). Partial reinforcement: A hypothesis of sequential effects. Psychological Review, 73, 459–477.
Capaldi, E. J. (1967). A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 67–155). New York: Academic Press.
Capaldi, E. J. (1974). Partial reward either following or preceding consistent reward: A case of reinforcement level. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 954–962.
Capaldi, E. J., Berg, R. F., & Morris, M. D. (1975). Stimulus control of responding in the early trials of differential conditioning. Learning & Motivation, 6, 217–229.
Capaldi, E. J., Miller, D. J., Alptekin, S., Barry, K., & Hagg-bloom, S. J. (1991). Memory retrieval and discrimination learning. Learning & Motivation, 22, 439–452.
Eckerman, C. O. (1969). Probability of reinforcement and the development of stimulus control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 551–559.
Gibbon, J., Farrell, L., Locurto, C. M., Duncan, H. J., & Terrace, H. S. (1980). Partial reinforcement in autoshaping with pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 45–59.
Grosslight, J. H., & Radlow, R. (1956). Patterning effect of the nonreinforcement-reinforcement sequence in a discrimination situation. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 49, 542–546.
Grosslight, J. H., & Radlow, R. (1957). Patterning effect of nonreinforcement-reinforcement sequence involving a single nonreinforced trial. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 50, 23–25.
Hagobloom, S. J. (1978). Intertriai interval effects on internal stimulus control of behavior in brightness differential conditioning. Learning & Motivation, 9, 347–358.
Haggbloom, S. J. (1980a). Effects of training level and locus of N-R transitions on resistance to discrimination. Psychological Record, 30, 419–422.
Haggbloom, S. J. (1980b). Resistance to discrimination and subsequent resistance to extinction as a function of the sequence of partial S+ reward in differential conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 441–446.
Haggbloom, S. J. (1980c). Reward sequence and reinforcement level as determinants of S− behavior in differential conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 424–428.
Haggbloom, S. J. (1981). Effects of reinforcement level and number of N-R transitions on resistance to discrimination. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 197–199.
Haggbloom, S. J., & Tillman, D. J. (1980). Sequential effects on discrimination reversal. Learning & Motivation, 11, 318–338.
Neely, J. H., & Wagner, A. R. (1974). Attenuation of blocking with shifts in reward: The involvement of schedule-generated contextual cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 751–763.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–69). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Wagner, A. R. (1961). Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 234–242.
Williams, B. A. (1981). Invariance in reinforcements to acquisition with implications for the theory of inhibition. Behavior Analysis Letters, 1, 73–80.
Williams, B. A. (1989). Partial reinforcement effects on discrimination learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17, 418–432.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haggbloom, S.J., Capaldi, E.J. Effects of percentage of reinforcement and number of reinforcements in S+ on discrimination learning in the runway. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 30, 283–286 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330465
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330465