Abstract
The experiment reported here tested the common belief that comparative judgments become biased because response habits intervene when the observer feels uncertain about which response to give. Using the method of constant stimuli, observers were shown a train of lines, each separated by a 5-sec interval. The observer compared the length of each line with the length of the line immediately preceding it. In addition to making the comparative judgment, the observer had to rate the degree of confidence he/she had in determining that the last line seen was different in length from the immediately preceding line. The results showed that (1) degree of confidence was progressively lowered (slightly) as the number of responses increased, (2) degree of confidence was higher when the last line seen was a variable (even if the observer did not know which was the standard or the variable), and (3) time errors also occurred when the observer was completely certain that there was a difference in length between the compared lines. It may be concluded that the observer’s state of uncertainty did not activate any preexisting response habit. The results seem to fit an inferential-decision theory of comparative judgment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bower, G. (1971). Adaptation-level coding of stimuli and serial position effects. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 175–201). New York: Academic Press.
Fechner, G. T. (1960). Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig, East Germany: Breitkopf & Hartel.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hellström, A. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirros of cognitive processes in comparing. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 35–61.
Martin, L. J., & Muller, G. E. (1899). Zur Analyse der Unterschieds-emfindlichkeit. Leipzig, East Germany: Barth.
Masin, S. C. (1987). Different biases in the methods of constant and single stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 379–382.
Masin, S. C., & Fanton, V. (1988). An explanation for the presentation-order effect in the method of constant stimuli. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Masin, S. C., Fanton, V., & Crestoni, L. (1988). An experimental study of the asymmetry effect in the method of constant stimuli. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Masin, S. C., Mazzoni, G., & Vallortigara, G. (1987). The first five responses in the method of constant stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 80–83.
Needham, J. G. (1934). The time-error in comparison judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 31, 229–243.
Woodruff, B., Jennings, D. L., & Rico, N. L. (1975). Time error in lifted weights as affected by presentation order and judgment mode. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 98–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was made possible by a grant from CNR (the Italian Research Council).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Masin, S.C., Ceretta, G. Experimental test of the relation of confidence with the time errors in the method of constant stimuli. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 27, 31–34 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329889
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329889