Abstract
Rats perceived pairings of a light + tone compound conditioned stimulus (CS) with either a high- or low-value food unconditioned stimulus (US). Conditioning to the tone was blocked if the light had previously been paired with the same-value US. Considerable conditioning occurred to the tone if the light had been paired with the other-value US before compound conditioning. However, if after conditioning of the light, the compound was first paired with the same-value US, then subsequent pairings of the compound with the other-value US generated little conditioning to the tone. These results supported theories of blocking and unblocking that emphasize changes in the processing of the CS.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Rererences
Dickinson, A., Hall, G., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1976). Surprise and the attenuation of blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 313–322.
Fowler, H. (1978). Cognitive associations as evident in the blocking effects of response-contingent CSs. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig(Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 109–153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holland, P. C. (1977). Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 77–104.
Holland, P. C. (1984). Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 476–497.
Kamin, L. J. (1968). Attention-like processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive Stimulation (pp. 9–32). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. Campbell & R. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–298). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.
Mackintosh, N. J., & Turner, C. (1971). Blocking as a function of novelty of CS and predictability of UCS. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 359–366.
Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 106, 532–552.
Rescorla, R. A., & Colwill, R. M. (1983). Within-compound associations in unblocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 390–400.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holland, P.C. Pretraining a compound conditioned stimulus reduces unblocking. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 23, 237–240 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329837
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329837