Abstract
We tried to replicate mood-dependent memory retrieval in a two-list interference design, as reported earlier in Experiment 3 of Bower, Monteiro, and Gilligan (1978, “Emotional mood as a context for learning and recall,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 573–585). Subjects in the experimental condition learned two word lists for free recall, one list while feeling happy, a second list while feeling sad. Later they recalled both lists while feeling happy or sad. Results revealed no mood dependency in recall; subjects recalled about the same percentage of words from the same-mood list as from the opposite-mood list. Thus, mood-dependent retrieval must be judged to be an unreliable phenomenon in the laboratory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett, J. C., Burleson, G., & Santrock, J. W. (1982). Emotional mood and memory in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 59–76.
Bartlett, J. C., & Santrock, J. W. (1979). Affect-dependent episodic memory in young children. Child Development, 50, 513–518.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.
Bower, G. H., Monteiro, K. P., & Gilligan, S. G. (1978). Emotional mood as a context for learning and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 573–585.
Clark, M. S., Milberg, S., & Ross, J.(1983). Arousal cues material stored in memory with a similar level of arousal: Implications for understanding the effects of mood on memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 633–649.
Ellis, E. A. (1983). Emotional mood as a context for state-dependent retention: Some limitations of the phenomenon. Unpublished senior honors thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto.
Estes, W. K. (1958). Stimulus-response theory of drive. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 6). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Goerss, J. C., & Miller, M. E. (1983, May). Memory and mood: State- dependent retention and induced affect. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.
Isen, A. M., Shalker, T., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Positive affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1–12.
Leight, K. A., & Ellis, H. C. (1981). Emotional mood states, strategies, and state-dependency in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 251–266.
Macht, M. L., Spear, N. E., & Levis, D. J. (1977). State-dependent retention in humans induced by alterations in affective state. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 415–418.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values of 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 76(1, Pt. 2).
Schare, M. L., Lisman, S. A., & Spear, N. E. (1984). The effects of mood variation on state-dependent retention. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8, 387–407.
Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. N. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.
Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bower, G.H., Mayer, J.D. Failure to replicate mood-dependent retrieval. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 23, 39–42 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329773
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329773