Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 477–478 | Cite as

Attributions of female college students to variations in pupil size

  • Nancy Tomlinson
  • Robert A. Hicks
  • Robert J. Pellegrini
Article

Abstract

Ratings were obtained from 246 female college students to the full-face photographs of a male and female peer. For each model, the photographs had been retouched to provide a continuum of pupil sizes (i.e., small, moderately large, and large). Consistent with a limited literature, a significant inverse linear trend was observed between pupil size and the positiveness of the like-sex ratings. The relationship between pupil size and the positiveness of the cross-sex ratings was an unanticipated inverted U-shaped curve. The significance of these data for the pupil size/nonverbal communication literature was discussed.

References

  1. Hess, E. H. The role of pupil size in communication. Scientific American, 1975, 233, 110–119. (a)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hess, E. H. The tell-tale eye. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1975. (b)Google Scholar
  3. Hess, E. H., & Goodwin, E. The present state of pupillometrics. In M. P. Janisse (Ed.), Pupillary dynamics and behavior. New York: Plenum, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. Hicks, R. A., Reaney, T., & Hill, L. Effects of pupil size and facial angle on preference for photographs of a young woman. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 388–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Janisse, M. P. Pupillometry: The psychology of the pupillary response. Washington, D.C: Hemisphere, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy Tomlinson
    • 1
  • Robert A. Hicks
    • 1
  • Robert J. Pellegrini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySan Jose State UniversitySan Jose

Personalised recommendations