Abstract
Marmoset monkeys, trained to bar press in a Sidman avoidance procedure were punished with decreased, response-contingent shock ratios. Initial increases in response frequencies were rapidly replaced by reduced rates. Avoidance percentages were not appreciably altered, even when every other response was punished. Eventually, an optimal balance was established between adequate avoidance responding and minimal exposure to the punishment contingencies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appel, J. B. The aversive control of an operant discrimination. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1960a, 3, 35–47.
Appel, J. B. Some schedules involving aversive control. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1960b, 3, 349–359.
Sandier, J., Davidson, R. S., Greene, W. E., & Holzschuh, R. D. Effects of punishment intensity on instrumental avoidance behavior. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., in press.
Sidman, M. Some notes on “bursts” in free-operant avoidance experiments. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1958, 1, 167–172.
Sidman, M., Hermstein, R. J., & Conrad, D. J. Maintenance of avoidance behavior by unavoidable shocks. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1957, 50, 553–557.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant Number MH 06581 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sandler, J., Davidson, R.S. & Holzschuh, R.D. Effects of increasing punishment frequency on Sidman avoidance behavior. Psychon Sci 5, 103–104 (1966). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328302
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328302