Abstract
Word pairs varying in word association probability between members of the pairs were used to obtain judgements of similarity (JS) and three different sets of association strength judgements. Correlations between JS and associative judge-were low with the highest reaching.33. Correlations between JS and normative association strength were also low. Some correlations between associative judgements and normative values were high with the correlation between bi-directional associative judgements and bi-directional norms reaching .98.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Garskof, B. E., & Houston, J. P. A reanalysis of the meaning similarity-associative strength relationship. Mimeo, 1963.
Haagen, C. H. Synonymity, vividness, familiarity and association value ratings of 400 pairs of common adjectives. J. Psychol., 1949, 27, 453–463.
Russell, W. A., & Jenkins, J. J. Language in behavior: The complete Minnesota norms for responses to 100 Words from the Kent-Rosanoff Word Association Test. Tech. Rep. No. 11, N 8onr, 66216, University of Minnesota, 1954.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garskof, B.E., Forrester, W. The relationships between judged similarity, judged association, and normative association. Psychon Sci 6, 503–504 (1966). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328113
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328113