Abstract
Groups consistently reinforced for either emotional or non-emotional words showed no verbal-conditioning differences, but both groups subsequently showed facilitated tachistoscopic recognition of emotional words as compared with inconsistently reinforced or unreinforced control groups. These results indicate that increased discrimination of the reinforced response class provided by its consistent pairing with the reinforcing event, rather than actual strengthening of this response class through reinforcement, may be the basic process operating in verbal-conditioning situations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. Emotional selectivity in perception and reaction. J. Pers., 1947, 16, 69–77.
Jenkins, J. J., Russell, W. A., & Suci, G. J. An atlas of semantic profiles for 360 words. Amer. J. Psychol., 1958, 71, 688–699.
Levinger, G., & Clark, J. Emotional factors in the forgetting of word associations. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1961, 62, 99–105.
McGinnies, E. Emotionality and perceptual defense. Psychol. Rev., 1949, 56, 244–251.
Ullmann, L. P., Weiss, K. L., & Krasner, L. The effect of verbal conditioning of emotional words on the recognition of threatening stimuli. J. clin. Psychol., 1963, 19, 182–183.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Note
1. Based on an undergraduate honors thesis by the senior author, who is now at Clark University. Partial support for the research and preparation of the manuscript was obtained from Public Health Service Grant HD-01062-G3 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hunt, S.L., Battig, W.F. Verbal conditioning: Reinforcement or discriminability?. Psychon Sci 6, 59–60 (1966). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327956
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327956