Abstract
One hundred human Ss conditioned and extinguished in a parallel fashion to both the warning signal of a masking probability learning task and the programmed CS. Acquisition and extinction curves were similar for early and nonearly responders though early responders had a higher response rate during acquisition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
GORMEZANO, I., & MOORE, J. W. Effects of instructional set and UCS intensity on the latency, percentage, and form of the eyelid response. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 487–494.
SPENCE, K. W. Cognitive and drive factors in the extinction of the conditioned eye blink in human subjects. Psychol Rev., 1966a, 73, 445–458.
SPENCE, K. W. Extinction of the human eyelid CR as a function of presence or absence of the UCS during extinction. J. exp. Psychol., 1966b, 71, 642–648.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by NASA grant NGR 10-007-010.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berman, J., Williams, C.D. & Schneiderman, N. Warning signal as a component of a compound stimulus in human eyelid conditioning. Psychon Sci 9, 541–542 (1967). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327879
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327879