Advertisement

Psychobiology

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 305–311 | Cite as

Different time course for age-related changes of behavior in a complex spatial cone-field discrimination task in Lewis rats

  • F. Josef van der Staay
  • Arjan Blokland
  • Wijnand Raaijmakers
Article

Abstract

Clear age-related impairments in learning and memory performance have consistently been reported for rodents in spatial discrimination tasks. The aim in the present study was to evaluate whether Lewis rats display age-associated changes in spatial working memory (WM) and reference memory (RM) performance and whether the changes in their performance on both memory components follow the same time course. Rats of five different ages of the Lewis strain were trained on a complex spatial discrimination task in a cone field. This task allows the simultaneous assessment of WM and RM. We observed that WM performance declined already between 4 and 12 months of age. RM performance, on the other hand, was better in the 18-, 24-, and 30-month-old animals than in the two youngest age groups. This was probably because the younger rats adopted the habit of extensively inspecting nonreinforced places. Correlation analysis of the data supported the view that WM and RM represent different aspects of spatial memory. The study corroborates the notion that distinct aspects of behavior decline differently with age.

Keywords

Spatial Memory Trial Block Work Memory Reference Memory Radial Maze 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barnes, C. A. (1988). Spatial learning and memory processes: The search for their neurobiological mechanisms in the rat. Trends in Neurosciences, 11, 163–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, C. A., Nadel, L., & Honig, W. K. (1980). Spatial memory deficit in senescent rats. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 29–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burek, J. D. (1978). Pathology of aging rats. West Palm Beach, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  4. Coleman, P. D. (1989). How old is old? Neurobiology of Aging, 10, 115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman, P. D., Finch, C, & Joseph, J. (1990). The need for multiple time points in aging studies. Neurobiology of Aging, 11, 1–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gage, F. H., Chen, K. S., Buzsaki, G., & Armstrong, D. (1988). Experimental approaches to age-related cognitive impairments. Neurobiology of Aging, 9, 645–655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gage, F. H., Dunnett, S. B., & Björklund, A. (1984). Spatial learning and motor deficits in aged rats. Neurobiology of Aging, 5, 43–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallagher, M., & Pelleymounter, M. A. (1988). Spatial learning deficits in old rats: A model for memory decline in the aged. Neurobiology of Aging, 9, 549–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodrick, C. L. (1968). Learning, retention, and extinction of a complex maze habit for mature-young and senescent Wistar albino rats. Journal of Gerontology, 27, 298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodrick, C. L. (1980). Problem solving and age: A critique of rodent research. In R. L. Sprott (Ed.), Age, learning ability and intelligence (pp. 5–25). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  11. Ingram, D. K. (1985). Analysis of age-related impairments in learning and memory in rodent models. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 444, 312–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ingram, D. K., Spangler, E. L., & Vincent, G. P. (1983). Behavioral comparison of aged virgin and retired breeder mice. Experimental Aging Research, 9, 111–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jucker, M., Oettinger, R., & Bättig, K. (1988). Age-related changes in working and reference memory performance and locomotor activity in the Wistar rat. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 50, 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindsay, S., Nichols, C. W., & Chaikoff, I. L. (1968). Naturally occurring thyroid carcinoma in the rat. Similarities to human medullary carcinoma. Archives of Pathology, 86, 353–364.Google Scholar
  15. Lowy, A. M., Ingram, D. K., Olton, D. S., Waller, S. B., Reynolds, M. A., & London, E. D. (1985). Discrimination learning requiring different memory components in rats: Age and neurochemical comparisons. Behavioral Neuroscience, 99, 638–651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Markowska, A. L., Stone, W. S., Ingram, D. K., Reynolds, J., Gold, P. E., Conti, L. H., Pontecorvo, M. J., Wenk, G. L., & Olton, D. S. (1989). Individual differences in aging: Behavioral and neurobiological correlates. Neurobiology of Aging, 10, 31–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oades, R. D., & Isaacson, R. L. (1978). The development of food search behavior by rats: The effects of hippocampal damage and haloperidol. Behavioral Biology, 24, 327–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olton, D. S. (1977). Spatial memory. Scientific American, 236(6), 82–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olton, D. S. (1983). Memory functions and the hippocampus. In W. Seifert (Ed.), Neurobiology of the hippocampus (pp. 335–373). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Olton, D. S. (1988). Aging and spatial cognition. Neurobiology of Aging, 9, 569–570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Olton, D. S., Becker, J. T., & Handelmann, G. E. (1979). Hippocampus, space, and memory. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 2, 313–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olton, D. S., & Papas, B. C. (1979). Spatial memory and hippocampal function. Neuropsychologia, 17, 669–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olton, D. S., & Samuelson, R. J. (1976). Remembrance of places passed: Spatial memory in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rapp, P. R., Rosenberg, R. A., & Gallagher, M. (1987). An evaluation of spatial information processing in aged rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. van der Staay, F. J., Krechting, B., Blokland, A., & Raaümakers, W. G. M. (1990). The cone field: A spatial discrimination task for the automatic and simultaneous assessment of working and reference memory in rats. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 31, 13–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. van der Staay, F. J., Raaumakers, W. G. M., Lammers, A. J. J. C, & Tonnaer, J. A. D. M. (1989). Selective fimbria lesions impair acquisition of working and reference memory of rats in a complex discrimination task. Behavioural Brain Research, 32, 151–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. van der Staay, F. J., Raaumakers, W. G. M., Sakkee, A. N., & van Bezooijen, C. F. A. (1988). Spatial working and reference memory of adult and senescent rats after thiopental anaesthesia. Neuroscience Research Communications, 3, 55–61.Google Scholar
  28. van der Staay, F. J., van Nies, J., & Raaumakers, W. (1990). The effects of aging in rats on working and reference memory performance in a spatial holeboard discrimination task. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 53, 356–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Luutelaar, E. L. J. M., van Staay, F. J., & Kerbusch, J. M. L. (1989). Spatial memory in rats: A cross validation study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41B, 287–306.Google Scholar
  30. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Josef van der Staay
    • 1
  • Arjan Blokland
    • 1
  • Wijnand Raaijmakers
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuropsychology and PsychobiologyUniversity of LimburgMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations