Abstract
Monkeys with mammillary-body lesions were compared with operated and unoperated control monkeys on the acquisition of a series of place and object reversal discriminations. The animals with mammillary-body lesions were found not to differ from the control animals on either the initial acquisition of a place response or the visual discrimination of two junk objects. On subsequent reversals, however, monkeys with mammillary-body lesions were severely impaired on the spatial task, but showed no impairment in reversal learning in the object task. These results are consistent with our previous findings of an impairment in spatial alternation learning following mammillary-body lesions in monkeys and supports the hypothesis that the role of the mammillary nuclei in cognition may be limited to the spatial domain.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Butters, N. The Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome: A review of psychological, neuropathological, and etiological factors. In M. Galanter (Ed.), Currents in alcoholism (Vol. 8). New York: Grune & Stratton, 1981.
Butters, N., & Cermack, L. S. Alcoholic Korsakoff’ s syndrome: An information processing approach to amnesia. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Gross, C. G. Inferotemporal cortex and vision. In E. Steller & J. M. Sprague (Eds.), Progress in physiological psychology (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Holmes, E. J., Jacobson, S., Stein, B. M., & Butters, N. Ablations of the mammillary nuclei in monkeys: Effects on post-operative memory. Experimental Neurology, 1983, 81, 97–113.
Jones, B., & Mishkin, M. Limbic lesions and the problem of stimulus-reinforcement associations. Experimental Neurology, 1972, 36, 362–377.
Kapur, N., & Butters, N. Visuoperceptive deficits in long-term alcoholics and alcoholics with Korsakoff’s psychosis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1977, 38, 2025–2035.
Mahut, H. Spatial and object reversal learning in monkeys with partial temporal lobe ablations. Neuropsychologia, 1971, 9, 409–424.
Mahut, H. A selective spatial deficit in monkeys after transection of the fornix. Neuropsychologia, 1972, 10, 65–74.
O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.
Ocsar-Berman, M., Sahakian, B. J., & Wikmark, G. Spatial probability learning by alcoholic Korsakoff patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1916, 2, 215–222.
Oscar-Berman, M., & Zola-Morgan, S. Comparative neuropsychology and Korsakoff’ s syndrome: I. Spatial and visual reversal learning. Neuropsychologia, 1980, 18, 499–512.
Snider, R. S., & Lee, J. C. A stereotaxic atlas of the monkey brain (Macaca mulatta) Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961
Thompson, R. A note on cortical and subcortical injuries and avoidance learning by rats. InJ. M. Warren & K. Akert (Eds.), The prefrontal granular cortex and behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
Thompson, R. Rapid forgetting of a spatial habit in rats with hippocampal lesions. Science, 1981, 212, 959–960.
Thompson, R., Langer, S. K. & Rich, I. Lesions of the limbic system and short-term memory in albino rats. Brain, 1964, 87, 537–542.
Victor, M., Adams, R. D., & Collins, G. H. The Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by funds from the Medical Research Service of the Veterans Administration and in part by NIAAA Grant AA-00187 to Boston University School of Medicine. During the course of the research, E. J. Holmes and N. Butters were associated with the Psychology Service of the Boston VA Medical Center and the Neurology Department of Boston University School of Medicine; S. Jacobson and B. M. Stein were associated with the Departments of Anatomy and Neurosurgery at their two institutions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holmes, E.J., Butters, N., Jacobson, S. et al. An examination of the effects of mammillary-body lesions on reversal learning sets in monkeys. Psychobiology 11, 159–165 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03326788
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03326788