Abstract
During Phase 1, 24 rats received CS1 (light)-shock trials while the remaining 24 rats received CS1 and shock on a random control schedule. During Phase 2, all subjects were presented trials of CS2 (tone)-shock. When CS2 was subsequently presented immediately after CS, while subjects licked for water, it was found that subjects that had received CS1-shock pairings during Phase 1 exhibited less suppression of licking to CS2, indicating less distress, than control subjects. The results are compatible with the opponent-process theory and suggest the presence of a positive hedonic afterreaction to an aversive event which reduced distress to a following aversive event.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anisman, H., &Waller, T. G. Facilitative and disruptive effects of prior exposure to shock on subsequent avoidance performance.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,78, 113–122.
Caul, W. F., &Barrett, R. J. Electroconvulsive shock effects on conditioned heart rate and suppression of drinking.Physiology and Behavior, 1972,8, 287–290.
James, J. P., &Mostoway, W. W. Conditioned suppression of licking as a function of shock intensity.Psychonomic Science, 1968,13, 161–162.
LaBarbera, J. D., &Caul, W. F. An opponent-process interpretation of post-shock bursts in appetitive responding.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1976,4, 386–390.
LoLordo, V. M. Positive conditioned reinforcement from aversive situations.Psychological Bulletin, 1969,72, 193–203.
Mackintosh, N. J. A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 276–298.
Rescorla, R. A. Information variables in Pavlovian conditioning. In G. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Rescorla, R. A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 71–80.
Rescorla, R. A., &LoLordo, V. M. Inhibition of avoidance behavior.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965,69, 406–412.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Solomon, R. L., &Corbit, J. D. An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect.Psychological Review, 1974,81, 119–145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LaBarbera, J.D., Caul, W.F. Decrement in distress to an aversive event during a conditioned positive opponent-process. Animal Learning & Behavior 4, 485–489 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214444
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214444