Abstract
Two experiments assessed the role of aftereffect learning in rats rewarded with sucrose solutions. In Experiment 1, rats were trained in a single straight runway for two trials on each of 18 days, each trial terminating with either large (20% scurose) or small (3% sucrose) reward. The ITI was 3–5 min. The sequence of daily rewards for each of four groups was small-small (SS), small-large, (SL), large-small (LS), or large-large (LL). Response patterning and a simultaneous negative contrast effect were observed in LS and SL relative to the consistently rewarded controls. During 10 massed extinction trials, resistance to extinction was greatest for Group SL, followed in order by Groups SS, LL, and LS. Experiment 2 examined single alternation of large and small rewards administered for 10 trials on each of 31 days with an ITI of 60 sec. Reward for one group was 20% or 3% sucrose while another received 1 or 10 45-mg Noyes pellets. Appropriate patterning developed only in the food-pellet rewarded animals. The overall results suggest that sucrose rewards may produce high-amplitude and long-duration aftereffects which interfere with learning in designs employing several massed daily trials, but which may facilitate learning—relative to food-pellet rewards—with longer intertrial intervals and fewer daily trials.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Ludvigson, H. W., McNeese, R. R., & Collerain, I.Aversion, then attraction to conspecific frustration odor as a function of experience. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, November 1973.
References
Bitterman, M. E. The comparative analysis of learning.Science, 1975,188, 699–707.
Bloom, J. M., Williams, D. T., &Metze, L. D. Effects of varied and partial reward on discrete-trial patterning of rats.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 167–170.
Bower, G. H. A contrast effect in differential conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,62, 196–199.
Burns, R. A., Woodard, W. T., Henderson, T. B., &Bitterman, M. E. Simultaneous contrast in the goldfish.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 97–100.
Campbell, P. E. Sequences of delayed reward and extinction confinement: Effects on pattern running and extinction performance.Psychonomic Science, 1969,1, 34–35.
Capaldi, E. J. A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1967.
Capaldi, E. J., &Lynch, A. D. Repeated shifts in reward magnitude: Evidence in favor of an associational and absolute (noncontextual) interpretation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,75, 226–235.
Cogan, D., &Capaldi, E. J. Relative effects of delayed reinforcement and partial reinforcement on acquisition and extinction.Psychological Reports, 1961,9, 7–13.
Crespi, L. P. Quantitative variation of incentive performance in the white rat.American Journal of Psychology, 1942,55, 467–517.
Elliott, M. H. The effect of change of reward on the maze performance of rats.University of California Publications in Psychology, 1928,4, 19–30.
Flaherty, C. F., &Davenport, J. W. Successive brightness discrimination in rats following regular versus random intermittent reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,96, 1–9.
Flaherty, C. F., Riley, E. P., &Spear, N. E. Effects of sucrose concentration and goal units on runway behavior in the rat.Learning and Motivation, 1973,4, 163–175.
Franchina, J. J., &Brown, T. S. Reward magnitude shift effects in rats with hippocampal lesions.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,76, 365–370.
Franchina, J. J., &Sparling, D. L. Effects of sucrose concentrations on single alternation runway responding in rats.Learning and Motivation, 1973,4, 471–479.
Gonzalez, R. C. Patterning in goldfish as a function of magnitude of reinforcement.Psychonomic Science, 1972,28, 53–55.
Gonzalez, R. C., &Bitterman, M. E. Spaced-trials partial reinforcement as a function of contrast.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,67, 94–103.
Gonzalez, R. C., Ferry, M., &Powers, A. S. The adjustment of goldfish to reduction in magnitude of reward in massed trials.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 23–26.
Gonzalez, R. C., Potts, A., Pitcoff, K., &Bitterman, M. E. Runway performance of goldfish as a function of complete and incomplete reduction in amount of reward.Psychonomic Science, 1972,27, 305–307.
Gonzalez, R. C., &Powers, A. S. Simultaneous contrast in goldfish.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 96–98.
Homzie, M. J., &Ross, L. E. Runway performance following a reduction in the concentration of a liquid reward.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1962,55, 1029–1033.
Horn, J. A., &Campbell, P. E. The effect of goal box delay and separate delay box delay on pattern running.Psychonomic Science, 1969,17, 5–6.
Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century, 1943.
Hull, C. L. A behavior system. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952.
Katz, S., Woods, G., &Carrithers, J. H. Reinforcement aftereffects and intertrial interval.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,72, 624–626.
Krane, R. V., &Wagner, A. R. Taste aversion learning with a delayed shock US: Implications for the “generality of the laws of learning.”Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975,88, 882–889.
Leonard, D. W. Amount and sequence of reward in partial and continuous reinforcement.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,67, 204–211.
Leonard, D. W., Albin, R., &Lebowitz, M. Performance under massed or spaced extinction following different sequences of varied reward training.Psychonomic Science, 1969,16, 130–131.
Likely, D., Little, L., &Mackintosh, N. J. Extinction as a function of magnitude and percentage of food or sucrose reward.Canadian Journal of Psychology Review of Canadian Psychology, 1971,25, 130–137.
Lowes, G., &Bitterman, M. E. Reward and learning in the goldfish.Science, 1967,157, 455–457.
Mackintosh, N. J. Reward and aftereffects of reward in the learning of goldfish.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,76, 225–232.
Mackintosh, N. J. The psychology of animal learning. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Mackintosh, N. J., &Lord, J. Simultaneous and successive contrast with delay of reward.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 283–286.
Pert, A., &Bitterman, M. E. Reward and learning in the turtle.Learning and Motivation, 1970,1, 121–128.
Pert, A., &Gonzalez, R. C. Behavior of the turtle (Chrysemys picta picta) in simultaneous, successive, and behavioral contrast situations.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974,87, 526–538.
Rosen, A. J. Incentive-shift performance as a function of magnitude and number of sucrose rewards.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966,62, 487–490.
Rosen, A. J., Glass, D. H., &Ison, J. R. Amobarbital sodium and instrumental performance changes following reward reduction.Psychonomic Science, 1967,9, 129–130.
Rosen, A. J., &Ison, J. R. Runway performance following changes in sucrose rewards.Psychonomic Science, 1965,2, 335–336.
Shanab, M. E., France, J., &Young, T. Negative contrast effect obtained with downshifts in magnitude but not concentration of solid sucrose reward.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,5, 429–432.
Surridge, C. T., &Amsel, A. Acquisition and extinction under single alternation and random partial-reinforcement conditions with a 24-hour intertrial interval.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,72, 361–368.
Tyler, D. W., Wortz, E. C., &Bitterman, M. E. The effect of random and alternating partial reinforcement on resistance to extinction in the rat.American Journal of Psychology, 1953,66, 57–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research is part of a doctoral dissertation supervised by H. D. Kimmel and submitted to the Department of Psychology at the University of South Florida.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burns, R.A. Effects of sequences of sucrose reward magnitudes with short ITIs in rats. Animal Learning & Behavior 4, 473–479 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214442
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214442