Abstract
Pigeons responded on a two-key concurrent chains choice procedure with the same level of percentage reinforcement on each key. During the initial links, a choice response on either key occasionally produced a conditioned reinforcer—which on one key was associated with a 15-sec, and on the other key with a 30-sec, interreinforcement interval—or an extinction stimulus. In Part 1, the initial links were equal. With successive decreases in the probability of a reinforcer, choice shifted from preference for the 15-sec terminal link toward indifference. In Part 2, the initial links were unequal and were arranged so that the shorter initial link preceded the 30-sec terminal link. At a high probability of a reinforcer, the pigeons again preferred the 15-sec terminal link. However, at a low probability, the pigeons reversed and preferred the alternate key. It was concluded that the conditioned reinforcers tended to become functionally equivalent at a low probability of a reinforcer, despite the nominally different interreinforcement intervals, with the result that choice was then modulated by the relative size of the initial links. The data are inconsistent with the view that choice and the strength of conditioned reinforcers are isomorphic with the reduction in delay to reward correlated with terminal link stimuli.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baum, W. The correlation based law of effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973,20, 137–153.
Catania, A. C. Concurrent performances: Reinforcement interaction and response independence.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963,6, 252–263.
Eckerman, D. E. Uncertainty reduction and conditioned reinforcement.Psychological Record, 1973,23, 39–47.
Fantino, E. Choice and rate of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969,12, 723–730.
Fantino, E. Conditioned reinforcement. II: Choice and information. In W. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.),Handbook of operant behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Ferster, C. B., &Skinner, B. F. Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
Herrnstein, R. I. Secondary reinforcement and rate of primary reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964,7, 27–36.
Kendall, S. B. Effects of two procedures for varying information transmission on observing responses.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973,20, 73–83.
Kendall, S. B. Preference for intermittent reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,21, 463–473. (a)
Kendall, S. B. Maintenance of observing responses with the less highly valued stimulus in pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 210–214. (b)
Kendall, S. B. Enhancement of conditioned reinforcement by uncertainty.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,24, 311–314.
McMillan, J. C. Percentage reinforcement of fixed-ratio and variable interval performances.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971,15, 297–302.
McMillan, J. C. Average uncertainty as a determinant of observing behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 401–408.
Neuringer, A. J., &Chung, S. -H. Quasi-reinforcement: Control of responding by a percentage reinforcement schedule.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967,10, 45–54.
Notterman, J. M. A study of some relations between periodic reinforcement, discrirmnation training, and secondary reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951,41, 161–169.
Reynolds, G. S. Behavioral contrast.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961,4, 57–71.
Schneider, J. W. Effects of percentage reinforcement on choice in a concurrent chain schedule.Psychonomic Science, 1968,12, 211–212.
Staddon, J. E. R., &Innis, N. K. Reinforcement omission on fixed interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969,12, 689–700.
Squires, N., &Fantino, E. A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent chain schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971,15, 27–38.
Taus, S., &Hearst, E. Effects of intertrial (blackout) duration on response rate to a positive stimulus.Psychonomic Science, 1970,19, 265–276.
Wilton, R. N. The role of information in the emission of observing responses and partial reinforcement acquisition phenomena.Learning and Motivation, 1972,3, 479–499.
Wilton, R. N., &Clements, R. O. Observing responses and informative stimuli.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971,15, 199–204.
Wilton, R. N., &Cay, R. A. Behavioral contrast in chained schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969,12, 905–910.
Zeiler, M. D. Fixed interval behavior: Effects of percentage reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972,17, 177–189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This experiment was used as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree at the University of California, San Diego. The research and preparation of the manuscript were supported by NIH Grant 20752.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, J. Choice and percentage reinforcement in pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior 4, 441–450 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214437
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214437