Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000)

  • Notes And Comment
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neath (2000) presents a useful overview of the evidence to be explained by any model of the effects of irrelevant speech on immediate serial memory and proposes a model accompanied by computational simulation. While his review is in general accurate, it is limited in its explanation of the crucial characteristics of the disrupting sounds. It also neglects strategic issues, particularly the tendency for subjects to switch strategy as list length increases. As a result, his model fails to account for the absence of an interaction between irrelevant speech and acoustic similarity for lists of span length. Points of issue between Neath’s feature hypothesis and the phonological loop interpretation are outlined, and the contribution of his computational simulation is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1966a). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 362–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1966b). The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 302–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory.Science,255, 556–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., &Ecob, J. R. (1970). Simultaneous acoustic and semantic coding in short-term memory.Nature,277, 288–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., &Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device.Psychological Review,105, 158–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V. J., &Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., &Salamé, P. (1986). The unattended speech effect: Perception or memory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 525–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N., &Hitch, G. J. (1992). Towards a network model of the articulatory loop.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 429–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N., &Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing.Psychological Review,106, 551–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chincotta, D.,Baddeley, A. D., &Stafford, L. (2000).Is the word length in STM attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Colle, H. A. (1980). Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 722–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colle, H. A., &Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R., &Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span.British Journal of Psychology,55, 429–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Day, L., Saults, J. S., Keller, T. A., Johnson, T., &Flores, L. (1992). The role of verbal output time and the effects of word length on immediate memory.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., Elliott, E. M., &Geer, T. (2000). Is there a temporal basis of the word length effect? A response to Service (1998).Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 647–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellermeier, W., &Hellbruck, J. (1998). Is level irrelevant in “irrelevant speech”? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1406–1414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellermeier, W., &Zimmer, K. (1997). Individual differences in susceptibility to the “irrelevant speech” effect.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,102, 2191–2199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. W., Wilson, K. P., Humphreys, M. S., Tinzmann, M. B., &Bowyer, P. M. (1983). Phonemic-similarity effects in good versus poor readers.Memory & Cognition,11, 520–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order. The start-end model.Cognitive Psychology,36, 73–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. S. (1982). Phonological coding in dyslexic readers.British Journal of Psychology,73, 455–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. S., Rugg, M. E., &Scott, T. (1987). Phonological similarity effects, memory span and developmental reading disorders: The nature of the relationship.British Journal of Psychology,78, 205–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M. (1993). Objects, streams and threads of auditory attention. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Attention: Selection, awareness and control (pp. 87–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M., &Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant-speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M., &Macken, W. J. (1995a). Auditory babble and cognitive efficiency: Role and number of voices and their location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,1, 216–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M., &Macken, W. J. (1995b). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect. Within- or between-stream similarity?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M., &Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 550–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. D., Baddeley, A. D., &Andrade, J. (2000). Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: Implications for models of short-term verbal memory.Memory,8, 145–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, D. C., &Shaibe, D. M. (1997). On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant-speech effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 100–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A., Liberman, I. Y., &Shankweiler, D. (1980). Children’s memory for sentences and word strings in relation to reading ability.Memory & Cognition,8, 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J. (1968). Articulation and acoustic confusability in shortterm memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 679–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neath, I., Surprenant, A. M., &LeCompte, D. C. (1998). Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect.Memory & Cognition,26, 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, M. P. A., &Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall.Psychological Review,105, 761–781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T., Anderson, E., Barker, D., Bradley, A., Fearneyhough, C., Henson, R., Hudson, S., &Baddeley, A. (1996). Working memory in chess.Memory & Cognition,24, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma, P. (1995).Chess players’ thinking: A cognitive psychological approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamé, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 150–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamé, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1983). Differential effects of noise and speech on short-term memory. InProceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (pp. 751–758). Milan: Centro Ricerche e Studi Amplifon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamé, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 263–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamé, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1987). Noise, unattended speech and short-term memory.Ergonomics,30, 1185–1194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salamé, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. (1998). Effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 283–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Mark, L. S., Fowler, C. A., &Fischer, F. W. (1979). The speech code and learning to read.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 531–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., &Jonides, J. (1995). Working memory in humans: Neuropsychological evidence. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.),The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1009–1020). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, S., &Jones, D. M. (1998). Role of habituation in the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence from the effects of token set size and rate of transition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 659–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallar, G., &Baddeley, A. D. (1984). Fractionation of working memory. Neuropsychological evidence for a phonological shortterm store.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., &Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 51–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 8 Woodland Road, BS8 1TN, Bristol, England

    Alan D. Baddeley

Authors
  1. Alan D. Baddeley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan D. Baddeley.

Additional information

Support of Grant G9423916 from the Medical Research Council is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baddeley, A.D. The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000). Psychon Bull Rev 7, 544–549 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214369

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214369

Keywords

Search

Navigation