Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 462–473 | Cite as

Four teleological theories of addiction

  • Howard RachlinEmail author
Article

Abstract

Four theories are presented to account for addiction, defined as a high rate of consumption of a substance that is ultimately harmful to the organism. The theories are teleological and behavioral in the sense that the ultimate motivational forces they posit lie in the environmental context of behavior—in an economic utility function or a process of behavioral adjustment—rather than in an internal physiological or cognitive mechanism. A theory by the psychologists Richard Herrnstein and Drazen Prelec is discussed that shows how melioration (maximization of local, as opposed to overall, or global, utility) may lead down a “primrose path” to addiction. A theory by the economists Gary Becker and Kevin Murphy shows how a primrose path may exist even when overall utility is maximized—provided that utility of temporally distant events is discounted. Two other theories, one by George Stigler and Gary Becker and one introduced here, an elaboration of the Stigler-Becker theory called “relative addiction,” specify economic properties of addictive substances that would create the primrose path.

Keywords

Relative Price Price Sensitization Addictive Substance Real Price Discount Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ainslie, G. (1992).Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. D. S., &Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development.American Psychologist,46, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1976).The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., &Murphy, K. M. (1992). Rational addiction and the effect of price on consumption. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.),Choice over time (pp. 361–370). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S., &Murphy, K. M. (1990). A theory of rational addiction.Journal of Political Economy,96, 675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaloupka, F. J. (1991). Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking.Journal of Political Economy,99, 722–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chung, S. H., &Herrnstein, R. J. (1967). Choice and delay of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,10, 67–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook, P. J., &Tauchen, G. (1980). The effect of liquor taxes on heavy drinking.Bell Journal of Economics,13, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeGrandpre, R. J., &Bickel, W. K. (1996). Drug dependence as consumer demand. In L. Green & J. H. Kagel (Eds.),Advances in behavioral economics: Vol. 3. Substance use and abuse (pp. 1–36). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  10. Fisher, E. B., Jr. (1996). A behavioral-economic perspective on the influence of social support on cigarette smoking. In L. Green & J. H. Kagel (Eds.),Advances in behavioral economics: Vol. 3. Substance use and abuse (pp. 207–236). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  11. Green, L., Fry, A. F., &Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life span comparison.Psychological Science,5, 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Green, L., &Kagel, J. H. (Eds.) (1996).Advances in behavioral economics: Vol. 3. Substance use and abuse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  13. Green, L., &Rachlin, H. (1991). Economic substitutability of electrical brain stimulation, food and water.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,55, 133–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrnstein, R. J. (1997).The matching law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Herrnstein, R. J., &Prelec, D. (1992). A theory of addiction. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.),Choice over time (pp. 331–360). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Herrnstein, R. J., &Vaughan, W., Jr. (1980). Melioration and behavioral allocation. In J. E. R. Staddon (Ed.),Limits to action: The allocation of individual behavior (pp. 143–176). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Heyman, G. M. (1996a). Elasticity of demand for alcohol in humans and rats. In L. Green & J. H. Kagel (Eds.),Advances in behavioral economics: Vol. 3. Substance use and abuse (pp. 107–132). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  18. Heyman, G. M. (1996b). Resolving the contradictions of addiction.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,19, 561–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heyman, G. M., &Tanz, L. (1995). How to teach a pigeon to maximize overall reinforcement rate.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,64, 277–298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McMorrow, M. J., &Foxx, R. M. (1983). Nicotine’s role in smoking: An analysis of nicotine regulation.Psychological Bulletin,93, 302–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mischel, W. (1966). Theory and research on the antecedents of self-imposed delay of reward. In B. A. Maher (Ed.),Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 3, pp. 85–132). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mobilia, P. (1990).An economic analysis of addictive behavior: The case of gambling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
  23. Nisbet, C. T., &Vakil, F. (1972). Some estimates of price and expenditure elasticities of demand for marijuana among U.C.L.A. students.Review of Economics & Statistics,54, 473–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Premack, D. (1965). Reinforcement theory. In D. Levine (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: 1965 (pp. 123–179). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rachlin, H. (1978). A molar theory of reinforcement schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,30, 345–360.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rachlin, H. (1992). Teleological behaviorism.American Psychologist,47, 1371–1382.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rachlin, H. (1994).Behavior and mind: The roots of modern psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rachlin, H. (1995). Self-control: Beyond commitment.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,18, 109–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rachlin, H., Battalio, R., Kagel, J., &Green, L. (1981). Maximization in behavioral psychology.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,4, 371–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rachlin, H., &Burkhard, B. (1978). The temporal triangle: Response substitution in instrumental conditioning.Psychological Review,85, 22–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raineri, A., &Rachlin, H. (1993). The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,6, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility.Review of Economic Studies,4, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schuster, C. R.,Silverman, K.,Harrell, S.,Brooner, R.,Cone, E., &Preston, K. (1995).ASP as a predictor of treatment outcome in a contingency management program for cocaine abusers. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, San Juan, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
  34. Silverman, L. P., &Spruill, N. L. (1977). Urban crime and the price of heroin.Journal of Urban Economics,4, 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stigler, G., &Becker, G. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum.American Economic Review,67, 76–90.Google Scholar
  36. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1988).The health consequences of smoking: Nicotine addiction. A report of the Surgeon General (DHHS Publication No. 89-8411). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. Vuchinich, R. E., &Tucker, J. (1996a). Alcohol relapse, life events, and behavioral theories of choice: A prospective analysis.Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology,4, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vuchinich, R. E., &Tucker, J. (1996b). The molar context of alcohol abuse. In L. Green & J. H. Kagel (Eds.),Advances in behavioral economics: Vol. 3. Substance use and abuse (pp. 133–162). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  39. Young, T. (1983). The demand for cigarettes: Alternative specifications of Fujii’s model.Applied Economics,15, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentState University of New YorkStony Brook

Personalised recommendations