Abstract
In a letter-identification task, subjects matched a probe letter to the initial letter of a subsequently presented probe word. We varied word frequency and predicted that the performance of vivid imagers would resemble that of typical young adults, whereas the performance of poor imagers would fall in between that of typical young adults and of older adults, or would simply resemble the performance of typical older adults (a linear decrease in reaction time [RTJ with word frequency; see Allen & Madden, 1989). The in-between function for young and older adults combined predicts a dip in RT for very-high-frequency words compared to medium-high-, low-, and very-low-frequency words. As predicted, vivid imagers exhibited increased latencies for medium-high-frequency words relative to the other three word-frequency categories, whereas poor imagers exhibited a dip.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, P. A. (1990). Influence of processing variability on adult age differences in memory distribution of order information.Cognitive Development,5, 177–192.
Allen, P. A., & Emerson, P. L. (in press). Holism revisited: Evidence for independent word-level and letter-level input channels during word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Allen, P. A., &Madden, D. J. (1989). Adult age differences in the effects of word frequency during visual letter identification.Cognitive Development,4, 283–294.
Allen, P. A., &Madden, D. J. (1990). Evidence for a parallel input serial analysis model of word processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 48–64.
Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., & Crozier, L. C. (in press). Adult age differences in letter-level and word-level processing.Psychology & Aging.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Corcoran, D. W. J. (1967). Acoustic factors in proofreading.Nature,214, 851–852.
Corcoran, D. W. J., &Weening, D. L. (1968). Acoustic factors in visual search.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 83–85.
Finke, R. A. (1979). Functional equivalence of mental images and errors of movement.Cognitive Psychology,11, 235–264.
Finke, R. A. (1985). Theories relating mental imagery to perception.Psychological Bulletin,98, 236–259.
Finke, R. A., &Schmidt, M. J. (1977). Orientation-specific color aftereffects following imagination.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 599–606.
Fodor, J. A. (1983).The modularity of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Graves, R., &Bradley, R. (1987). Millisecond interval timer and auditory reaction time programs for the IBM PC.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,19, 30–35.
Gur, R. C., &Hilgard, E. R. (1975). Visual imagery and the discrimination of differences between altered pictures simultaneously and successively presented.British Journal of Psychology,66, 341–343.
Healy, A. F. (1980). Proofreading errors on the word the: New evidence on reading units.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 45–57.
Healy, A. F., &Drewnowski, A. (1983). Investigating the boundaries of reading units: Letter detection in misspelled words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 413–426.
Healy, A. F., Oliver, W. L., &McNamara, T. P. (1987). Detecting letters in continuous text: Effects of display size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 279–290.
Holbrook, M. B. (1978). Effect of subjective interletter similarity, perceived word similarity and contextual variables on the recognition of letter substitution in a proofreading task.Perceptual & Motor Skills,47, 251–258.
Johnson, N. F., Allen, P. A., &Strand, I. L. (1989). On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.Memory & Cognition,17, 474–482.
Johnston, J. C. (1978). A test of the sophisticated guessing theory of word perception.Cognitive Psychology,9, 123–153.
Keppel, G. (1982).Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Krueger, L. E., &Allen, P. A. (1987). Same-different judgments of foveal and parafoveal letter pairs by older adults.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 329–334.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lindholm, J. M., &Parkinson, S. R. (1983). An interpretation of age-related differences in letter-matching performance.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 283–294.
Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures.British Journal of Psychology,64, 17–24.
Marks, D. F. (1989). Construct validity of the vividness of imagery questionnaire.Perceptual & Motor Skills,69, 459–465.
Priebe, F. A., &Wallace, B. (1986). Hypnotizability, imaging ability, and the detection of embedded objects.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,33, 320–329.
Reeves, A. (1980). Visual imagery in backwards masking.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 118–124.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 275–280.
Scialfa, C. T., &Kline, D. W. (1988). Effects of noise type and retinal eccentricity on age differences in identification and localization.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,43, P91–99.
Sloboda, J. A. (1976). The effect of item position on the likelihood of identification by inference in prose reading and music reading.Canadian Journal of Psychology,30, 228–237.
Wallace, B. (1984). Apparent equivalence between perception and imagery in the production of various visual illusions.Memory & Cognition,12, 156–162.
Wallace, B. (1988). Imaging ability, visual search strategies, and the univividness paradox.Journal of Mental Imagery,12, 173–184.
Wallace, B. (1990). Imagery vividness, hypnotic susceptibility, and the perception of fragmented stimuli.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,58, 354–359.
Wallace, B. (in press). Imaging ability and performance in a proofreading task.Journal of Mental Imagery.
Wallace, B., Persanyi, M. W., &Gerboc, B. (1989). Imagery, hypnosis, and the creation of subjective contours.Journal of Mental Imagery,13, 139–152.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support for this project was provided by a Research Challenge Grant from Cleveland State University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, P.A., Wallace, B. & Waag, E. Effect of imagery ability on letter-level and word-level processing. Perception & Psychophysics 49, 295–300 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214313
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214313