Abstract
Experiments showing that in cued recall subjects can recall words that they had previously failed to recognize have been taken to refute generate-recognize theories of recall, for those theories predict that recall is dependent on recognition. None of these experiments, however, has provided an appropriate test of Bahrick’s (1970, 1979) generate-recognize theory, which explicitly refers to words that are accessible to cued recall but not to free recall, that is, tofree-recall failures. When the experimental procedure was modified so as to provide tests of this theory, no evidence was found of any greater dependency between recall and recognition of free-recall failures than between recall and recognition overall. Free-recall failures do not, therefore, constitute any exception to many previous experimental findings that conform with the Tulving-Wiseman law, and so the account offered by Bahrick’s generate-recognize theory may be rejected. The results also suggest an explanation for some other conflicting evidence on whether recall and recognition are dependent or independent.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bahrick, H. P. (1970). Two-phase model for prompted recall.Psychological Review,77, 215–222.
Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Broader methods and narrower theories for memory research: Comments on the papers by Eysenck and Cermak. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 141–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. (1975). The recognition of words which cannot be recalled. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention & Performance (Vol. 5, pp. 575–590). New York: Academic Press.
Flexser, A. J., &Tulving, E. (1978). Retrieval independence m recogration and recall.Psychological Review,85, 153–171.
Gardines, J. M., &Tulving, E. (1980). Exceptions to recognition failure of recallable words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 194–209.
Glass, A. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1986).Cognition (2nd ed.. New York: Random House
Gregg, V. H. (1986).Introduction to human memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Jones, G. V., & Gardiner, J. M. (1988).Recognition failure with identical retrieval cues. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Kintsch, W. (1974).The representation of meaning m memory Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Kintsch, W. (1978). More on recognition failure of recallable words: Implications for generation-recognition models.Psychological Review,85, 470–473.
Martin, E. (1975). Generation-recognition theory and the encoding specificity principle.Psychological Review,82, 150–153.
Muter, P. (1984). Recognition and recall of words with a single meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,10, 198–202.
Nilsson, L. G., Dinniwell, M., &Tulving, E. (1987). Recognition failure of categorized words.Memory & Cognition,15, 389–396.
Nilsson, L. G., Law, J., &Tulving, E. (1988). Recognition failure of recallable unique names: Evidence for an empirical law of memory and learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,14, 266–277.
Reder, L. M., Anderson, J. R., &Bjork, R. A. (1974). A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity.Journal of Experimenial Psychology,102, 648–656.
Tulving, E. (1976). Ecphoric processes in recall and recognition. In J Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition (pp. 37–73). London: Wiley.
Tulving, E. (1983).Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Tulving, E., &Watkins, M J. (1975). Structure of memory traces.Psychological Review,82, 261–275.
Tulving, E., &Watkins, O. C. (1977). Recognition failure of words with a single meaning.Memory & Cognition,5, 513–522.
Tulving, E., &Wiseman, S. (1975). Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,6, 79–82.
Watkins, M. J., &Gardiner, J. M. (1979). An appreciation of generate-recognize theory of recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 687–704.
Watkins, M. J., &Todres, A. K. (1978). On the relation between recall and recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 621–633.
Watkins, M. J., &Tulving, E. (1975). Episodic memory: When recognition fails.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1, 5–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gardiner, J.M. Recognition failures and free-recall failures: Implications for the relation between recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition 16, 446–451 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214225
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214225