Abstract
Pigeons were given free-operant successive discrimination training in which, on alternate days, two different interdimensional problems were employed (color positive and line angle negative; a different color negative and a different line angle positive). Between days, these problems could be construed as intradimensional ones. For one group, training was conducted on each problem in the presence of the same ambient (contextual) stimuli, while for a second group each problem was trained in a different context. For a third group, these two contexts were randomly related to the problems. Postdiscrimination stimulus generalization gradients showed that peak shifts were obtained in both the same context and the random context groups, but no peak shifts were found for the group which learned each problem in a different context. Results were consistent with Spear’s (1973) treatment of animal memory which attributes retention test performance to the operation of a “context-elicited” retrieval process. An alternative uniprocess conditioning account of these and similar data was also discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Chiszar, D. A., &Spear, N. E. Stimulus change, reversal learning and retention in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,69, 190–195.
Hanson, H. M. Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959,58, 321–334.
Hearst, E. Discrimination learning as the summation of excitation and inhibition.Science, 1968,196, 1303–1306.
Hearst, E. Excitation, inhibition, and discrimination learning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Fundamental issues in associative learning. Halifax: Dalhousie University Press, 1969.
Lyons, J., &Akins, F. The effect of two alternating interdimensional discrimination tasks on stimulus control.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,2, 323. (Abstract)
Lyons, J., &Klipec, W. D. Color mixing with Kodak Wratten filters.Journal of the Experimental Anahsis of Behavior, 1971,15, 232.
Mackintosh, N. J. A theory of attention: Variations in associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 276–298.
Miller, J. T. The effect of contextual cue change during reversal training on postdiscrimination generalization gradients. Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado. 1972.
Purtle, R. Peak shift: A review.Psvchological Bulletin, 1973,80, 408–421.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Spear, N. E. Forgetting as retrieval failure. In W. K. Honig & P. James (Eds.),Animal memory. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Spear, N. E. Retrieval of memory in animals.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 163–194.
Spence, K. W. The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension.Psychological Review, 1937,44, 430–444.
Terrace, H. S. Stimulus control. In W. K. Honig (Ed.),Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
Thomas, D. R. The effects of drive and discrimination training on stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 24–28.
Wheatley, K. L., &Thomas, D. R. Relative and absolute density of reinforcement as factors influencing the peak shift.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 409–418.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this manuscript and the research reported herein was supported by NIMH Predoctoral Research Fellowship MH-05172 awarded to C. F. Hickis, and by NIH Research Grant HD-03486 and Training Grant M-10427 under the direction of D. R. Thomas.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hickis, C.F., Robles, L. & Thomas, D.R. Contextual stimuli and memory retrieval in pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior 5, 161–168 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214072
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214072