Abstract
In the first of three experiments, ducklings that had received prolonged exposure to the visibly moving imprinting object subsequently suppressed ongoing distress vocalization both during brief presentations of the moving object and during brief presentations of its initially neutral stimulus components (i.e., its auditory and static visual features). Only presentations of the moving object were followed by priming aftereffects (namely, enhancement of distress vocalization over a baseline rate). In Experiment 2, weak, but reliable, priming effects were detected after very long presentations of the auditory and static visual features. Experiment 3 found that these features strongly suppressed low, but not high, rates of distress vocalization, while the visibly moving object strongly suppressed both high and low rates. These studies suggest that initially neutral features of an imprinting object acquire the same sort of behavioral control as is exerted by the object when it is in motion, but that this control is somewhat weaker.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bruce, R. H. An experimental investigation of the thirst drive in rats with especial reference to the goal-gradient hypothesis.Journal of General Psychology, 1937,17, 49–60.
Eiserer, L. A., &Hoffman, H. S. Priming of ducklings’ responses by presenting an imprinted stimulus.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,82, 345–359.
Eiserer, L. A., &Hoffman, H. S. Acquisition of behavioral control by the auditory features of an imprinting object.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 275–277.
Eiserer, L. A., Hoffman, H. S., &Klein, S. H. Persistence of acquired behavioral control in the context of imprinting.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,24, 255–266.
Gallistel, C. R. Motivating effects in self-stimulation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966,62, 95–101.
Hoffman, H. S., Eiserer, L. A., &Singer, D. Acquisition of behavioral control by a stationary imprinting stimulus.Psychonomic Science, 1972,26, 146–148.
Hoffman, H. S., &Kozma, F., Jr. Behavioral control by an imprinted stimulus: Long term effects.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967,10, 495–501.
Hoffman, H. S., Stratton, J. W., Newby, V., &Barrett, J. E. Development of behavioral control by an inprinting stimulus.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,71, 229–236.
Howarth, C. I., &Deutsch, J. A. Drive decay: The cause of fast extinction of habits learned for brain stimulation. Science, 1962,137, 35–36.
Morgam, C. T., &Fields, P. E. The effect of variable preliminary feeding upon the rat’s speed-of-locomotion.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1938,26, 331–348.
Rolls, E. T. Involvement of brainstem units in medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation.Physiology and Behavior, 1971,7, 297–310.
Sluckin, W. Imprinting and early learning. Chicago: Aldine, 1965.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH-19715 from the National Institute of Mental Health, directed by Dr. Howard S. Hoffman of Bryn Mawr College. The author is no longer affiliated with Keuka College.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eiserer, L.A. Behavioral control by stimulus components of an imprinting object. Animal Learning & Behavior 5, 153–160 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214071
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214071