Abstract
Three procedures for magnitude estimation were investigated, and a sufficient number of responses were obtained to make reasonable estimates of both the mean and variance of the responses. The conventional magnitude estimate procedure, without a standard signal, appeared to produce the most sensible data. The best method of establishing the central tendency of the data appears to be the plot of the mean ratio of successive responses against the intensity ratio of the corresponding signal intensities. When this is done, the average response ratio increases roughly as a power function of the signal ratios. The coefficient of variation, σ/m, varies from about 0.1 for small signal ratios and increases to 0.3 at about 20 dB and greater signal separations. The distribution of response ratios appears to be reasonably well approximated by a beta distribution. The change in σ/m with signal ratio is suggestive of an attention mechanism in which the sample size depends on the location of the attention band. The ratio estimation procedure suffers badly from discrete number tendencies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braida, L. D., & Durlach, N. I. Intensity perception. II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972, 51, 483–502.
Cross, D. V. Sequential dependencies and regression in psychophysical judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 14, 547–552.
Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolutions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969, 46, 372–383.
Ekman, G., Hosman, B., Lindman, R., Ljungberg, L., & Åkesson, C. Å. Interindividual differences in scaling performance. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1968, 26, 815–823.
Garner, W. R. An equal discriminability scale for loudness of judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952, 43, 232–238.
Garner, W. R. An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953, 46, 373–380.
Garner, W. R., & Hake, H. W. The amount of information in absolute judgments. Psychological Review, 1951, 58, 446–459.
Green, D. M., & Luce, R. D. Speed-accuracy tradeoff in auditory detection. In S. Kornbhim (Ed.),Attention and performance, IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973. Pp. 547–569.
Holland, M. K., & Lockhead, G. R. Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 409–414.
Luce, R. D., & Green, D.M. A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 14–57.
Luce, R. D., & Green, D. M. The response ratio hypothesis for magnitude estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1974, 11, in press.
Luce, R. D., & Mo, S. S. Magnitude estimation of heaviness and loudness by individual subjects: A test of a probabilistic response theory. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 1965, 18, 159–174.
McGill, W. J. Stochastic latency mechanism. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. I. New York: Wiley, 1963. Pp. 309–360.
McGill, W. J. Neural counting mechanisms and energy detection in audition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1967, 4, 351–376.
Pollack, I. Identification and discrimination of components of elementary auditory displays. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1956, 28, 906–909.
Pradhan, P. L., & Hoffman, P. J. Effect of spacing and range of stimuli on magnitude estimation judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 533–541.
Schneider, B., & Lane, H. Ratio scales, category scales, and variability in the production of loudness and softness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963, 35, 1953–1961.
Siebert, W. M. Some implications of the stochastic behavior of primary auditory neurons. Kybernetic, 1965, 2, 206–215.
Siebert, W. M. Stimulus transformations in the peripheral auditory system. In P. A. Kolers and M. Eden (Eds.),Recognizing patterns. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1968. Pp. 104–133.
Siebert, W. M. Frequency discrimination in auditory system: Place or periodicity mechanisms? Proceedings of the IEEE, 1970, 58, 723–730.
Stevens, S. S. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 153–181.
Stevens, S. S. On the validity of the loudness scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1959, 31, 995–1003.
Stevens, S. S. Toward a resolution of the Fechner-Thurstone legacy. Psychometrika, 1961a, 26, 35–47.
Stevens, S. S. To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science, 1961b, 133, 80–86.
Stevens, S. S. Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review, 1971, 78, 426–450.
Stevens, J. C., & Guirao, M., Individual loudness functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964, 36, 2210–2213.
Swets, J. A., & Green, D. M. Sequential observations by human observers of signals in noise. In C. Cherry (Ed.),Information theory. London: Butterworths, 1961. Pp. 177–195. (Reprinted in J. A. Swets (Ed.), Signal detection and recognition by human observers. New York: Wiley, 1964. Pp. 221-242.)
Swets, J. A., Shipley, E. F., McKey, M. J., & Green, D. M. Multiple observations of signals in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1959, 31, 514–521. (Reprinted in J. A. Swets (Ed.), Signal detection and recognition by human ob sewers. New York: Wuey, 1964. Pp. 201-220.)
Ward, L. M. Category judgments of loudness in the absence of an experimental’induced identification function: Sequential effects and power functions fit. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 94, 179–187.
Ward, L. M. Repeated magnitude estimations with a variable standard: Sequential effects and other properties. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 193–200.
Ward, L. M., & Lockhead, G. R. Sequential effects and memory in category judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 84, 27–34.
Ward, L. M., & Lockhead, G. R. Response system processes in absolute judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 73–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation to the University of California, at Irvine and at San Diego.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greem, D.M., Duncan Luce, R. Variability of magnitude estimates: A timing theory analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 15, 291–300 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213947
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213947