Abstract
Taste intensity judgments in response to chemical stimulation of single human fungiform papillae were obtained by the method of magnitude estimation. Intensity scales constructed from these data were compared to those obtained from the same subjects in response to stimulation of the whole mouth. Single papilla functions conformed well to the power law governing the growth of sensation magnitude, although a minority of single papilla functions exhibited peaking of response magnitude at intermediate concentrations, followed by a decline in response magnitude at higher concentrations. Single papilla exponents were found to be lower than whole mouth exponents and were positively correlated with detection and/or recognition thresholds of the papillae for most compounds. Exponents of summated single papilla functions were greater than median single papilla exponents, but their relative magnitude vs. whole mouth exponents varied by test compound. The data were discussed in relationship to previous findings concerning flow rate effects, threshold-exponent relationships across the tongue surface, and level-dependent spatial summation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bartoshuk, L., &Cleveland, C. Mixtures of substances with similar tastes: A test of a psychophysical model of taste mixture interactions.Sensory Processes, 1977,1, 177–186.
Bealer, S. L., &Smith, D. V. Multiple sensitivity to chemical stimuli in single human taste papillae.Physiology & Behavior, 1975,14, 795–799.
Békésy, G. von. Taste theories and the chemical stimulation of single papillae.Journal of Applied Physiology, 1966,21, 1–9.
Bujas, Z., &Ostojcic, A. La sensibilité gustative en fonction de la surface excitée.Acta Instituti Psychologia Universitatis Zagrebiensis, 1941,13, 1–19.
Cardello, A. V. Chemical stimulation of single human fungi-form taste papillae: Sensitivity profiles and locus of stimulation.Sensory Processes, 1978,2, 173–190.
Collings, V. B. Human taste response as a function of locus of stimulation on the tongue and soft palate.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 169–174.
Engen, T. An evaluation of a method for developing ratioscales.American Journal of Psychology, 1956,69, 92–95.
Engen, T., &Levy, N. The influence of context on constantsum loudness judgments.American Journal of Psychology, 1958,71, 731–736.
Hara, S. Interrelationships among stimulus intensity, stimulated area and reaction in the human gustatory sensation.Bulletin of the Tokyo Medical & Dental University, 1955,2, 147–158.
Harper, H., Jay, J., &Erickson, R. Chemically evoked sensations from single human taste papillae.Physiology & Behavior, 1966,1, 319–325.
Jones, F. N., &Woskow, M. J. Some effects of context on the slope in magnitude estimation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,71, 170–176.
Kuznicki, J. T. Taste profiles from single human taste papillae.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1978,47, 279–286.
Marks, L.Sensory processes: The new psychophysics. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
McCutcheon, N. B., &Saunders, J. Human taste papilla stimulation: Stability of quality judgments over time.Science, 1972,175, 214–216.
Meiselman, H. L. Effect of presentation procedure on taste intensity functions.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,10, 15–18.
Meiselman, H. L., &Bose, H. E. Effects of flow rate on taste intensity ratings.Chemical Senses & Flavor, 1977,2, 515–522.
Meiselman, H. L., Bose, H. E., &Nykvist, W. E. Effect of flow rate on taste intensity responses in humans.Physiology & Behavior, 1972,9, 35–38.
Meiselman, H. L., &Dzendolet, E. Variability in gustatory quality identification.Perception & Psychophysics, 1967,2, 496–498.
Miller, I. J. Peripheral interactions among single papilla inputs to gustatory nerve fibers.Journal of General Physiology, 1971,57, 1–25.
Pfaffmann, C. Gustatory afferent impulses in cat, rat, and rabbit.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1955,18, 429–440.
Poulton, E. C. The new psychophysics: Six models of magnitude — estimation.Psychological Bulletin, 1968,69, 1–19.
Smith, D. V. Taste intensity as a function of area and concentration: Differentiation between compounds.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,87, 163–171.
Stevens, S. S. Neural events and the psychophysical law.Science, 1970,170, 1043–1050.
Stevens, S. S. Issues in psychophysical measurement.Psychological Reviews, 1971,78, 426–450.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was conducted as part of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts/Amherst.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardello, A.V. Psychophysical exponents for single papillae: A comparison with whole-mouth exponents. Perception & Psychophysics 25, 510–516 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213830
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213830