Abstract
The time needed to compare two symbols increases as the cognitive distance between them on the relevant dimension increases (symbolic distance effect). Furthermore, when subjects are told to choose either the larger or the smaller of two stimuli, the response time is shorter if the instruction is congruent with the overall size of the stimuli (semantic congruity effect). Three experiments were conducted to determine the locus of these effects in terms of a sequence of processing stages. The developmental aspects of these effects were also evaluated, as the subjects were from kindergarten, first grade, third grade, fifth grade, and college. By varying the visual quality of the stimulus in each experiment, it was determined that the distance effect resides in a comparison stage, whereas the congruity effect is an encoding phenomenon. Both distance and congruity effects were present at all grade levels, but they decreased in magnitude as grade increased. The results were interpreted relative to recent models of comparative judgments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Riley, C. A., Hu, J. M., & Hinrichs, J. V.The quantitative basis of children’s number concepts. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, March 1977.
Sternberg, S.Decomposing mental processes with reaction time data. Invited address presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit, Michigan, 1971.
Pachella, R. G.The effect of set on the tachistoscopic recognition of pictures (Tech. Rep. 17). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Human Performance Center, 1973.
References
Banks, W. P. Encoding and processing of symbolic information in comparative judgments. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1977.
Banks, W. P., Clark, H. H., &Lucy P. The focus of the semantic congruity effect in comparative judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 35–47.
Banks, W. P., Fujii, M., &Kayra-Stuart, F. Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitude of digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 435–447.
Bracey, G. W. Two operations in character recognition: A partial replication.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,6, 357–360.
Brown, A. L. The development of memory: Knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In H. W. Reese (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R., &Greenfield, P. M.Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley, 1966.
Buckley, P. B., &Gillman, C. B. Comparisons of digits and dot patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 1131–1136.
Curtis, D. W., Paulus, M. A., &Rule, S. J. Relation between disjunctive reaction time and stimulus difference.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,99, 167–173.
Duncan, E. M., &Kellas, G. Developmental changes in the internal structure of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1978,26, 328–340.
Flavell, J. H. Developmental studies of mediated memory. In H. W. Reese & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Haber, R. N. The nature of the effect of set on perception.Psychological Review, 1966,73, 335–350.
Hardzinski, M., &Pachella, R. G. The manipulation of stimulus quality and the definition of stimulus encoding operations in memory scanning experiments.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,27, 232–240.
Harris, G. J., &Fleer, R. E. High speed memory scanning in mental retardates: Evidence for a central processing deficit.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974,17, 452–459.
Herrmann, D. J., &Landis, T. Y. Differences in the search rate of children and adults in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977,23, 151–161.
Holyoak, K. J. The form of analog size information in memory.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 31–51.
Holyoak, K. J., Dumais, S. T., &Mover, R. S. Semantic association effects in a mental comparison task.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 303–313.
Hoving, K. L., Morin, R. E., &Konick, D. S. Recognition reaction time and size of the memory set: A developmental study.Psychonomic Science, 1970,21, 247–248.
Jamieson, D. C., &Petrusic, W. M. Relational judgments with remembered stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 373–378.
Keating, D. P., &.Bobbitt, B. L. Individual and developmental differences in cognitive-processing components of mental ability.Child Development, 1978,49, 155–167.
Maisto, A. A., &Baumeister, A. A. A developmental study of choice reaction time: The effect of two forms of stimulus degradation on encoding.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975,20, 456–464.
Marschark, M., &Paivio, A. Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: An expectancy hypothesis.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 175–184.
McFarland, C. E., Jr.,Duncan, E. M., &Kellas, G. Isolating the typicality effect in semantic memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978,30, 251–262.
Miller, J. O., &Pachella, R. G. Locus of the stimulus probability effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,101, 227–231.
Miller, J. O., &Pachella, R. G. Encoding processes in memory scanning tasks.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 501–506.
Moyer, R. S. Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973.13, 180–184.
Moyer, R. S., &Bayer, R. H. Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect.Cognitive Psychology, 1976,8, 228–246.
Moyer, R. S., &Dumais, S. T. Mental comparison. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. The time required for judgments of numerical inequality.Nature (London), 1967,215, 1519–1520.
Naus, M. J., &Ornsetin, P. A. Developmental differences in the memory search of categorized lists.Degelopmental Psychology, 1977,13, 60–68.
Neely, J. H. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977,106, 226–254.
Pachella, R. G. The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. New York: Wiley, 1974.
Parkman, J. M. Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,91, 191–205.
Piaget, J., &Inhelder, B.Mental imagery in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder.R. R. Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, 1975.
Rosch.E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 192–233.
Sekuler, R., &Mierkiewicz, D. Children’s judgments of numerical inequality.Child Development, 1977,48, 630–633.
Silverman, W. P. Complex visual discriminations in cultural familial retardates and normal children.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 539–545.
Sternberg, S. Two operations in character recognition: Some evidence from reaction-time measurements.Perception & Psychophysics, 1967,2, 45–53.
Sternberg, S. The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica, 1969,30, 276–315.
Sternberg, S. Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 1–32.
Trabasso, T., Riley, C A., &Wilson, E. G. The representation of linear order and spatial strategies in reasoning: A developmental study. In R. Falmagne (Ed.),Psychological studies of logic and its development. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by University College Faculty Research Grant 82-8221 to the second author. The contributions of the two authors were equal.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duncan, E.M., McFarland, C.E. Isolating the effects of symbolic distance, and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additive-factors analysis. Memory & Cognition 8, 612–622 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213781
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213781