Abstract
Photographs of a downtown street scene were taken from four different locations. At each location the photographs were taken in 12 different directions, 30 deg apart. In the acquisition phase of the experiments, subjects learned to identify the photographs in terms of the location from which they were taken. The testing phase took place immediately after acquisition, after a 1-week delay, after a 6-month delay, and on one occasion after a 1-year delay. Subjects were tested for their ability to identify the camera location for previously seen and new photographs, to discriminate previously seen from new photographs f!.e., recognition), and to place the camera locations on a map of the street scene. The results of six experiments provided converging evidence that subjects abstracted a schematic representation of the spatial layout of the scene from the discrete, partially overlapping photographic samples presented during acquisition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, G. L., Siegel, A. W., &Rosinski, R. R. The role of perceptual context in structuring spatial knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4, 617–630.
Bartlett, F. C.Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1932.
Biederman, I. On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1980.
Helmholz, H. Von.[A treatise on physiological optics (Vol. 3)] (J. P. C. Southall, Ed. and trans.) New York: Dover, 1963. (Originally published, 1866.)
Hochberg, J. E. In the mind’s eye. In R. N. Haber (Ed.),Contemporary theory and research in visual perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1968.
Hochberg, J. E.Perception. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
Loftus, G. R. On interpretation of interactions.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 312–319.
Mandler, J. M., &Johnson, N. S. Some of the thousand words a picture is worth.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 529–540.
Mandler, J. M., &Parker, R. E. Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 38–48.
Mandler, J. M., &Ritchey, G. H. Long-term memory for pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 386–396.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
Pittinger, J. B., &Jenkins, J. J. Apprehension of pictorial events: The case of a moving observer in a static environment.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1979,13, 117–120.
Posner, M. I., &Keele, S. W. Retention of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,83, 304–308.
Walls, G. L. The problem of visual direction.American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 1951. (Monograph)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is based, in part, on the thesis submitted by K. Schmelzkopf, in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Masters degree, to the Department of Geography, Florida Atlantic University. A version of the paper was read at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, Texas, November 1978.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hock, H.S., Schmelzkopf, K.F. The abstraction of schematic representations from photographs of real-world scenes. Memory & Cognition 8, 543–554 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213774
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213774