Abstract
Goldfish trained to discriminate between signals paired with shock (S−) and signals paired with shock omission (S+) with a linear presentation procedure, originally learned (OL) to control the signal state of a shuttle box and showed a decided preference for the S+ signal. In Experiment 1, following OL, groups had one OL signal replaced (S+ or S−), both signals replaced (S+ and S−), or the OL signals reversed (S+ and S− reversed) and were then tested in a transfer training procedure. In transfer, groups with one signal replaced maintained discriminated performance at OL levels; the S+ replaced group was slightly superior to the S− replaced group on the first day of transfer. With both OL signals replaced, discrimination dropped to chance performance levels, whereas, with OL signal shock pairing reversed, discrimination performance dropped below chance levels. In Experiment 2, following OL, extinction procedures consisted of turning off the shocker (0% shock) or of shocking 100% or a random 25% of the trials. A fourth extinction procedure (R,) retained the trial start response-dependent shock-omission contingency, but shock differentiating the S+ and S− signals was eliminated entirely. Extinction of the S+/S− discrimination was measured both during extinction training per se and with reversal retraining of the S+/S− discrimination later. Groups for which the OL S+ was paired with shock during extinction extinguished on both measures, but groups for which the OL S− was paired with shock omission did not extinguish, especially as shown by the reversal test procedure. Theoretical implications and the implications for several conditioning procedures are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolles, R. C. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 32–48.
Bolles, R. C. The role of stimulus learning in defensive behavior. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Bolles, R. C., Moot, S. A., &Grossen, N. E. The extinction of shuttlebox avoidance.Learning and Motivation, 1971,2, 324–333.
Davenport, D. E., &Olson, R. D. A. A interpretation of extinction in discriminated avoidance.Psychonomic Science, 1968,13, 5–6.
Derdzinski, D., &Warren, J. M. Perimeter, complexity, and form discrimination learning by cats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,68, 407–411.
Horner, J. L., Longo, N., &Bitterman, M. E. A shuttlebox for fish and a control circuit of general applicability.American Journal of Psychology, 1961,74, 114–120.
Jacobs, B. Repeated acquisition and extinction of an instrumental avoidance response.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963,56, 1017–1021.
Jenkins, H. M. Generalization gradients and the concepts of inhibition. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.),Stimulus generalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1965.
Mackintosh, N. J. The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press, 1974.
Mandler, J. M. Overtraining and the use of positive and negative stimuli in reversal and transfer.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 110–115.
Mason, J. R., Stevens, D. A., Wixon, D. R., &Owens, M. P. Assessment of the relative importance of S+ and S− in rats using differential training on intercurrent discriminations.Learning and Motivation, 1980,11, 49–60.
Morris, R. G. M. Pavlovian conditioned inhibition of fear during shuttlebox avoidance behavior.Learning and Motivation, 1974,5, 424–447.
Morris, R. G. M. Preconditioning of reinforcing properties to an exteroceptive feedback stimulus.Learning and Motivation, 1975,6, 289–298.
Mowrer, O. H. On the dual nature of learning—A reinterpretation of “conditioning” and “problem solving.”Harvard Educational Review, 1947,17, 102–148.
Rescorla, R. A., &Solomon, R. L. Two-process learning theory: Relationship between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 151–182.
Steiner, G. Stimulus control of avoidance learning in fish.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,74, 52–58.
Stevens, D. A., Mason, J. R., &Wixon, D. R. Assessment of the relative importance of S+ and S− in rats, using intercurrent simultaneous and successive discriminations.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1981,17, 200–202.
Stevens, D. A., &Fechter, L. D. Relative strengths of approach and avoidance tendencies in discrimination learning of rats trained under two types of reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,76, 489–491.
Wallace, J., &Scobie, S. R. Avoidance extinction in goldfish.Learning and Motivation, 1977,8, 18–38.
Weisman, R. G., &Litner, J. S. Positive conditioned reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,68, 597–603.
Woodard, W. T., &Bitterman, M. E. Pavlovian analysis of avoidance conditioning in the goldfish (Carassius auratus).Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,82, 123–129.
Zerbolio, D. J., Jr. Discriminated avoidance learning and reversal by goldfish in a shuttlebox using a linear presentation procedure.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1981,9, 346–356.
Zerbolio, D. J., &Reynierse, J. H. Discriminated learning and reversal in the wheat-turn avoidance situation.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1967,21, 185–195.
Zerbolio, D. J., Jr., &Wickstra, L. L. Goldfish avoidance acquisition: Is the process classical, instrumental, or phototaxis?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978,11, 321–323. (a)
Zerbolio, D. J., Jr., &Wickstra, L. L. Does elimination of a negative phototaxis eliminate CAR acquisition in goldfish?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978,11, 324–326. (b)
Zerbolio, D. J., Jr., &Wickstra, L. L. Instrumentally based conditioned avoidance response acquisition in goldfish in a simultaneous presentation task.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1979,13, 311–313.
Zerbolio, D. J., Jr., &Wickstra, L. L. Instrumental avoidance acquisition by goldfish in a Y-maze using explicit and response-contingent cues.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1980,8, 304–310.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zerbolio, D.J., Royalty, J.L. Acquisition and extinction of differential responses to signals paired with shock or shock omission in goldfish: Evidence for truly discriminated avoidance learning. Animal Learning & Behavior 10, 377–389 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213724
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213724